Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3450630
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T09:04:12+00:00 2026-05-18T09:04:12+00:00

We know that in Objective-C there are two main root classes: NSObject and NSProxy

  • 0

We know that in Objective-C there are two main root classes: NSObject and NSProxy. There are other roots (mainly for private and legacy purposes) like Object, and NSLeafProxy.

Defining a new root is fairly trivial:

@interface DDRoot <NSObject>

@end

@implementation DDRoot

//implement the methods required by <NSObject>

@end

My question is: why would you ever want to define a new root class? Is there some use-case where it’s necessary?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T09:04:13+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 9:04 am

    As far as I can tell, there should be no reason for creating your own root class, because short of implementing all of the NSObject protocol methods yourself, you’re going to be missing out on a lot of functionality, and going to be making a lot of calls to the Objective-C runtime that should essentially be done for you.

    Unless you really had to implement the protocol differently from the default (NSProxy is a special case that does have to), you shouldn’t need to make your own root class. I mean, you’d have to be writing a class that cannot fundamentally be represented by NSObject and the protocol as implemented by Apple, and in that case, why are you even writing it in Objective-C?

    That’s what I think. Maybe someone can come up for a creative use for it.

    (People researching the topic should go look at the NSObject Class Reference, NSObject Protocol Reference, ‘Core Competencies: Root Class’ document, and the ‘Root Class’ section of the Fundamentals Guide: Cocoa Objects document.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I know that you can insert multiple rows at once, is there a way
I know that I can do something like $int = (int)99; //(int) has a
I know that default cron's behavior is to send normal and error output to
I know that |DataDirectory| will resolve to App_Data in an ASP.NET application but is
I know that the MsNLB can be configured to user mulitcast with IGMP. However,
I know that .NET is JIT compiled to the architecture you are running on
I know that the following is true int i = 17; //binary 10001 int
I know that just using rand() is predictable, if you know what you're doing,
I know that IList is the interface and List is the concrete type but
I know that we shouldn't being using the registry to store Application Data anymore,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.