Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6757033
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T13:35:53+00:00 2026-05-26T13:35:53+00:00

We observed that, while joining a table with a multi-column PK to itself: a

  • 0

We observed that, while joining a table with a multi-column PK to itself:

  1. a join using all PK columns ran in .5s
  2. a join using all but one of the PK columns ran in 42-44s

Other, maybe extraneous information:

  • all PK columns had btree indexes
  • the column that we left out in the second case was a BOOLEAN (actually tinyint(1)) – so the result set was twice as large as in the first case
  • this was observed for both inner join and left join
  • no non-PK columns were used in the joins
  • running the query repeatedly did not result in a large decrease in execution time (maybe 2s)

Why was the difference in execution time so large?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T13:35:54+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 1:35 pm

    There is a unique index placed on a (set of) PK columns. View the explain plan to verify, but it is likely that the index is only used when joining on all PK columns.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

While using eclipse a couple of days back i observed that while building the
I have observed that in C++ namespaces are very rarely used while in .Net
I have observed for a while that C# programmers tend to use int everywhere,
I was debugging Jaroslaw Kowalski provider wrappers. While debugging it I observed that the
While debugging production code - I observed that my workflow constructor was triggered multiple
I have observed that, very infrequently, Internet Explorer (7 or 8, it does not
Making UML sequence diagram in VS 2010RC I've observed that there is no activation
With a third party API I observed the following. Instead of using, public static
This is a common question, but the explanations found so far and observed behaviour
while profiling NHibernate with NHProf I noticed that a lot of time is spend

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.