Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7820533
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 2, 20262026-06-02T07:20:02+00:00 2026-06-02T07:20:02+00:00

We want to implement a solid road map for our product development road map.

  • 0

We want to implement a solid “road map” for our product development road map. We use Jira (4.4.3) and Greenhopper for our project management and bug tracking but the Jira Roadmap feature simply shows you a list of the versions you have defined.

However, we currently use our “Versions” for each sprint, e.g. “Week 16”, “Week 17”, etc. which contain all of the tasks/issues for that week’s sprint.

Versions Screenshot

We currently use “Components” to keep track of major feature sets and to categorize (e.g. “Integrate with xyz API”, “Migrate emails to SendGrid”, “Bugs: Code”, or “Technical Debt”).

Components Screenshot

The Jira “Roadmap” feature shows the list of versions and the progress towards each. However, we’re already using Versions for tracking our weekly sprints, and some of these roadmap features will span many releases/versions/sprints.

Roadmap Screenshot

How can we keep track of our complete roadmap within Jira? We would really like to see a list of our major initiatives in this roadmap instead of a list of all of our weekly sprints (e.g. “Enable Selenium on CI server”, “Extranet MVC3 conversion”, “Upgrade production to R2”).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-02T07:20:03+00:00Added an answer on June 2, 2026 at 7:20 am

    Update

    The mentioned story GHS-945 had been resolved in GreenHopper 5.10 already – meanwhile GreenHopper 6.0 officially delivers all mentioned major improvements regarding Kanban, Scrum and especially custom agile board, planning and process management, plus many others not mentioned or available before. Accordingly the interim term Rapid Board has been dropped as well, see No longer Rapid by name – but still rapid by nature:

    In GreenHopper 6.0 the new board is no longer known as the “Rapid
    Board” — we figure everyone knows by now that it is vastly faster than
    the Classic boards. The new board has been built from the ground up on
    newer technology that enables us to provide optimum performance,
    making the most of your valuable time.

    Finally, the GreenHopper team continues to deliver significant improvements in almost biweekly point releases, with the last one addressing one of the few losses caused by the transition from the classic boards: release 6.0.2 features customizable card colors again, even more versatile than the classical variant, insofar you can now base the coloring on issue type, priority, assignee or a custom JQL query even.

    Conclusion

    Our former workflow including backlog coloring (see What Color is your Backlog?) is now fully migrated to the new GreenHopper, gaining a huge amount of significant new features and improvements on the fly and a respectively more agile and productive team.


    Initial Answer

    The version vs. sprint impedance mismatch in many areas of JIRA and GreenHopper is a well known problem for agile teams using this toolchain. We implemented various attempts to remedy it one way or another (mostly via version hierarchies of sorts, i.e. product versions and sprint versions with parent child relationships), none of which turned out to be really productive.

    Accordingly, the relatively dated story Add a separate field to allow tracking sprint and release information independent of one another (GHS-945) captures this topic. While it is unresolved as of today, GreenHopper is currently undergoing a major restructuring to address this (and related) problems, and while not quite finished yet, the respective functionality available today addresses your use case already (eventually), see the Atlassian Status as at February 28, 2012:

    Sprint as a separate custom field is now available in GreenHopper 5.9
    however it is only used by the Scrum Rapid Board (which can be enabled
    as a lab feature from the GreenHopper admin screens).

    The Rapid Board use of this field frees up fixVersion field for normal use.

    The mentioned Rapid Board and the restructuring in general is further detailed in The Future of GreenHopper:

    The Rapid Board is a fresh start for GreenHopper. We are building it
    to take advantage of the latest in web technology and provide you, the
    customer, with an awesome experience for planning, tracking and
    reporting on the progress of your agile projects and teams.

    The Rapid Board and related functionality currently improves quickly indeed, i.e. the GreenHopper team iterates fast and implements major improvements in currently monthly to biweekly point releases even.

    I’m totally sold on this approach, which basically builds the board on top of the versatile JQL functionality (see Advanced Searching), enabling almost complete freedom to assemble the perfect board for your needs.

    On top of that it solved the version vs. sprint impedance mismatch for us, insofar sprints are decoupled entities now and versions can be used as desired again, yielding a useful version and release date based customer facing JIRA Roadmap in turn.

    The transition to this new approach is a dedicated effort of course, requiring some planning and time eventually, also there are still some relevant shortcoming concerning the previously available functionality; for example, the currently unresolved story As a user, I would like to configure the cards displayed in the rapid board (GHS-3922) is important for us, because we have been using Philippe Kruchten’s innovative approach to backlog coloring (see What Color is your Backlog?) with great success and this is not possible for the Rapid Board yet.

    Finally, GreenHopper 5.9 requires JIRA 5.0, which may or may not be a showstopper right now.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a simple solid modeling application in which I want to implement several
I Want Implement a Software by C#.net.I want Use a DataBase Manager Software like
I want implement in my software solution an VBA editor but in c# 3.0.
given this class definition: public class Frame { IFrameStream CapturedFrom; } I want implement
Microsoft has announce that WindowsLiveID become a OpenID provider . I want implement it
I want to implement an autocomplete feature with images in my website. I would
I want to implement file uploading with behaviour which is commonly seen in various
I want to implement a function in the base class but I also want
I want to implement a Facebook updates(user action and notifications) on my web application
I want to implement a basic search/replace translation table in C; that is, it

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.