Well, I’m wondering why endd doesn’t seem to execute (though it doesn’t generate any error at compilation time).
struct dxfDato
{
dxfDato(int c, string v = 0, int t = 0) { codigo = c; valor = v; tipo = t; }
dxfDato() { }
int tipo;
int codigo;
string valor;
};
class dxfItem
{
private:
std::ostringstream ss;
typedef std::ostream& (*manip)(std::ostream&);
public:
int clase;
string valor;
vector<dxfDato> datos;
vector<dxfItem> hijos;
template <typename T>
dxfItem& operator<<(const T& x)
{
ss << x;
return *this;
}
dxfItem& operator<<(manip x) // to store std manipulators
{
ss << x;
return *this;
}
static dxfItem& endd(dxfItem& i) // specific manipulator 'endd'
{
dxfDato dd;
dd.valor = i.ss.str();
i.datos.push_back(dd);
std::cout << "endd found!" << endl;
return i;
}
};
/* blah blah blah */
dxfItem header;
header
<< 9 << endl << "$ACADVER" << endl << 1 << endl << "AC1500" << endl
<< dxfItem::endd // this apparently doesn't execute anything
<< "other data" << endl
;
This is the last problem that I found while trying to develop something. Last thing was exposed here: C++ Operator overloading example
Thank you all!
You’ve defined type
manipto be a function that takes astd::ostreamby reference and returns astd::ostreamby reference, but you’ve definedenddto take adxfItemand return adxfItemanddxfItemdoes not derive fromstd::ostream.Because of this type mismatch, the compiler is generating a call to the
operator<<template, rather than themanipoverload.Also, your
manipoverload needs to actually call the manipulator function passed into it: