Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 81201
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T21:25:22+00:00 2026-05-10T21:25:22+00:00

We’re trying to tune an application that accepts messages via TCP and also uses

  • 0

We’re trying to tune an application that accepts messages via TCP and also uses TCP for some of its internal messaging. While load testing, we noticed that response time degrades significantly (and then stops altogether) as more simultaneous requests are made to the system. During this time, we see a lot of TCP connections in TIME_WAIT status and someone suggested lowering the TIME_WAIT environment variable from it’s default 60 seconds to 30.

From what I understand, the TIME_WAIT setting essentially sets the time a TCP resource is made available to the system again after the connection is closed.

I’m not a ‘network guy’ and know very little about these things. I need a lot of what’s in that linked post, but ‘dumbed down’ a little.

  • I think I understand why the TIME_WAIT value can’t be set to 0, but can it safely be set to 5? What about 10? What determines a ‘safe’ setting for this value?
  • Why is the default for this value 60? I’m guessing that people a lot smarter than me had good reason for selecting this as a reasonable default.
  • What else should I know about the potential risks and benefits of overriding this value?
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T21:25:22+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 9:25 pm

    A TCP connection is specified by the tuple (source IP, source port, destination IP, destination port).

    The reason why there is a TIME_WAIT state following session shutdown is because there may still be live packets out in the network on their way to you (or from you which may solicit a response of some sort). If you were to re-create that same tuple and one of those packets showed up, it would be treated as a valid packet for your connection (and probably cause an error due to sequencing).

    So the TIME_WAIT time is generally set to double the packets maximum age. This value is the maximum age your packets will be allowed to get to before the network discards them.

    That guarantees that, before you’re allowed to create a connection with the same tuple, all the packets belonging to previous incarnations of that tuple will be dead.

    That generally dictates the minimum value you should use. The maximum packet age is dictated by network properties, an example being that satellite lifetimes are higher than LAN lifetimes since the packets have much further to go.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Related Questions

No related questions found

Stats

  • Questions 58k
  • Answers 58k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer Found a XSLT in the RSS toolkit for ASP.NET on… May 11, 2026 at 8:54 am
  • added an answer The All() extension method checks a predicate against all the… May 11, 2026 at 8:54 am
  • added an answer From following SQL Data Access Forums thread on MSDN Forum:… May 11, 2026 at 8:54 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.