Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 828151
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T03:41:03+00:00 2026-05-15T03:41:03+00:00

We’re using gems:unpack to ensure gem version consistency across environments. However, we’re running into:

  • 0

We’re using gems:unpack to ensure gem version consistency across environments. However, we’re running into:

can't activate , already activated [GEM-VERSION]

Is this because installed gems take precedence over frozen ones? Is it possible to have frozen gems activate first? Advice on ways to keep gems consistent welcome.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T03:41:03+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 3:41 am

    This usually happens when a gem/plugin you have packed requires a gem then a second gem/plugin requires a specific version of the same gem. The first gem requires the dependency, but when the second gem requires the specified version of the same gem then you will see the error you describe.

    For example:

    some_gem requires special_gem
    another_gem requires special_gem => 1.0
    

    And you have the following:

    Packed in app:
      special_gem 2.0
      some_gem 1.0
      another_gem 1.0
    
    Installed Locally:
      special_gem 1.0, 2.0
      some_gem 1.0
      another_gem 1.0
    

    Then the some_gem will require 2.0, but when another_gem requires 1.0 you get the error.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.