Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 659039
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T22:59:59+00:00 2026-05-13T22:59:59+00:00

We’ve been profiling our code recently and we’ve come across a few annoying hotspots.

  • 0

We’ve been profiling our code recently and we’ve come across a few annoying hotspots. They’re in the form

assert(a == b, a + " is not equal to " + b)

Because some of these asserts can be in code called a huge amount of times the string concat starts to add up. assert is defined as:

def assert(assumption : Boolean, message : Any) = ....

why isn’t it defined as:

def assert(assumption : Boolean, message : => Any) = ....

That way it would evaluate lazily. Given that it’s not defined that way is there an inline way of calling assert with a message param that is evaluated lazily?

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T22:59:59+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 10:59 pm

    Lazy evaluation has also some overhead for the function object created. If your message object is already fully constructed (a static message) this overhead is unnecessary.

    The appropriate method for your use case would be sprintf-style:

    assert(a == b,  "%s is not equal to %s", a, b)
    

    As long as there is a speciaized function

    assert(Boolean, String, Any, Any)
    

    this implementation has no overhead or the cost of the var args array

    assert(Boolean, String, Any*)
    

    for the general case.

    Implementing toString would be evaluated lazily, but is not readable:

    assert(a == b, new { override def toString =  a + " is not equal to " + b })
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 334k
  • Answers 334k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can define this in your CSS to set the… May 14, 2026 at 3:21 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer On Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard, it is even… May 14, 2026 at 3:21 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer That's not strange -- your pl.f doesn't take i as… May 14, 2026 at 3:21 am

Related Questions

We are developing a little application that given a directory with PDF files creates
We have been using CruiseControl for quite a while with NUnit and NAnt. For
We have a requirement in project to store all the revisions(Change History) for the
We have a remoting singleton server running in a separate windows service (let's call
We have an SVN repository running on a Windows server, and I want to

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.