Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8066315
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T11:56:46+00:00 2026-06-05T11:56:46+00:00

What are alternatives to free this object? it normally happens when call the .Exit()

  • 0

What are alternatives to “free” this object? it normally happens when call the .Exit() method is called, but in this case, I can’t do this because the user that should close the word application instance. I thought to do wordApp = null or call GC.Collect(); what’s the best solution and why? thanks in advance.

I’m using this currently:

   public static void Free()
    {
        if (wordApp != null)
        {
            System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.ReleaseComObject(wordApp);
            GC.Collect();
        }
    }
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T11:56:48+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 11:56 am

    The most aggressive way to ensure that the Interop object is properly released is the using the double Collect–WaitForPendingFinalizers pattern, adapted from Releasing COM Objects:

    Marshal.ReleaseComObject(wordApp);
    wordApp = null;
    GC.Collect(); 
    GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers(); 
    GC.Collect(); 
    GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers(); 
    

    One area of interop between the managed world and the unmanaged world in which you need to be especially careful is in cleanly releasing COM objects when you’re done with them. In the foregoing examples, we managed to achieve all the behavior we wanted using standard garbage collection. The only slight enhancement was to call GC.Collect twice to ensure that any memory that was available for collection but survived the first sweep was collected on the second sweep.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Are there any open source (read free) alternatives to Flex Builder? I do not
Does anyone know if there are any (ideally free) alternatives to SilkTest for automated
Even with the advanced technologies and available database tools (even free alternatives) are available
I hope this question is not too off-topic, if it is this post can
How can I debug the innards of the Join() extension method? I am NOT
Sorry for a poor title, feel free to edit. I can't understand what the
This is perhaps a question of semantics, but perhaps not, so I ask: Is
I've been struggling to bind a TextBox.Text to some object's public property but unfortunately
I am looking for TFS free alternatives to manage source code. I ve worked
From this wikipedia page: The fundamental difference between context-free grammars and parsing expression grammars

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.