Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 873329
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T10:55:01+00:00 2026-05-15T10:55:01+00:00

What cache concurrency strategy should be used for @ManyToOne fields for a particular entity

  • 0

What cache concurrency strategy should be used for @ManyToOne fields for a particular entity class. Would it make sense to use READ_ONLY instead of READ_WRITE, since these fields usually don’t change after entity creation

@ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
@Cache(usage = CacheConcurrencyStrategy.READ_WRITE)
...
private User user;
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T10:55:02+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 10:55 am

    If these fields “usually don’t change” as opposed to “never change”, then READ_ONLY is not an option. The other cache concurrency strategies offer different tradeoffs between database throughput and transaction integrity. The choice would depend on your particular circumstances and requirements.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Never used a cache like this before. The problem is that I want to
I'm implementing a cache in a class library that i'm using in an asp.net
I would like to cache my most database heavy actions in my asp.net-mvc site.
I got this síngleton cache object and it exposes an IEnumerable property which just
I'm needing to cache some data using System.Web.Caching.Cache . Not sure if it matters,
I want to cache custom data in an ASP.NET application. I am putting lots
I keep a cache of transactions to flush (to persistent storage) on the event
Rails caches (file cache) per default domain-based, but is there a way to disable
If you cache data from your database in ASP.NET session then you will speed
I have a cache which has soft references to the cached objects. I am

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.