Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8889615
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T22:18:15+00:00 2026-06-14T22:18:15+00:00

What can be considered a safe number of triangles/vertexes for a WebGL application to

  • 0

What can be considered a safe number of triangles/vertexes for a WebGL application to work on recent desktop/notebook machines (say, bought 2009 or after)? I’m worried about memory, not performance. The more vertexes I can send to WebGL, the better looking the scene will be. For some scenes, it would be nice if I could send 30k triangles (some 60k vertexes, due use of triangle strips).

Doing a quick calculation, 60k vertexes means a 60k x vec4, where each vec4 is 4 x 8 bytes (8 because I’m considering a double for each component). So that gives about 1.9mb of vertex memory. Is that safe for most recent WebGL environments?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T22:18:17+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 10:18 pm

    Should be ok but i more concern about webgl sandboxing limitations. For example Flash has limited amount of buffers and their size, shader instruction amount, only 4 (or 5) render contexts etc. and most likely memory. WebGL much less restrictive but implementation is 1. Browser dependant 2. machine dependant (Google Chrome can run WebGL on DirectX “angle project“) If browser doesn’t has DirectX fallback and machine hasn’t proper OpenGL drivers WebGL wont work. Also there was issues with different implementation of same origins policy for textures. So you can’t just hope that your app will work on any machine. You can’t avoid benchmarking.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In general, can the verify-methods in java.security.cert.Certificate be considered thread-safe? Specifically, verify(PublicKey key) and
Since TCP guarantees packet delivery and thus can be considered reliable, whereas UDP doesn't
I'm trying to generate valid trees given certain graph edges (which can be considered
I have two QT apps. One app can be considered to hold a big
I can't really get a grip on what is considered to be good and
Can I represent ontology by using XML? Why it is considered better to represent
Why return type of a method is not considered in method overloading ? Can
Recently I was asked in an interview that, can an Interface be considered as
Are Latin encoded characters considered URL safe? Having read this post , I'm aware
I am trying to make a Java application thread-safe. Unfortunately, it was originally designed

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.