Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6643879
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T00:06:05+00:00 2026-05-26T00:06:05+00:00

What human-readable and human-editable syntaxes exist that can be automatically converted to and from

  • 0

What human-readable and human-editable syntaxes exist that can be automatically converted to and from XML with no loss of expressivity. In other words, an updated version of this list. The three syntaxes mentioned there are:

  • SOX
  • PYX
  • SLiP

Are there others? (This isn’t about alternatives to XML, like JSON, but simply easier ways for humans to maintain XML files using a text editor).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T00:06:06+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 12:06 am

    Some more answers:

    • CompactXML – one alternative general purpose XML syntax, looks fairly sensible
    • SLAX – an alternative syntax for XSL. Looks like an odd hybrid of JavaScript, CSS, and…I’m not sure.
    • RELAX NG – a schema language for XML (like XSL), with a compact alternative syntax.

    And some useful links:

    • XSugar – interesting paper about the problem
    • XFlat – a general tool for converting between definable “flat” formats and XML. (So not a particular syntax)
    • XSCS – a paper describing something very similar to CompactXML above. I think.
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.