Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 863617
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T09:20:31+00:00 2026-05-15T09:20:31+00:00

what I am trying to do is represented in my other question with code.

  • 0

what I am trying to do is represented in my other question with code.

Basically I need to keep in memory a table of elements (structs), there’s no fixed number of elements that can exist, but it is small, but I still can’t use an array.

And I don’t want to use a linked list of elements because I don’t want to keep adding and deleting elements everytime I need to change anything.

Instead what I want to do is allocate a chunk of memory with a single malloc, that chunk of memory will be large enough for say, 100 elements, and if in the rare case that I need more, I can allocate another chunk of 100 elements and link it to the original….

Is this a good idea? is there a name for this kind of structure? it’s kinda of like dynamic expanding array? Do people actually use this? or I am just on crack? if this is bad idea, what do you recommend using instead?

Thanks

typedef struct Tb{
   POINT points;
   POINT *next;
} TABLE;

typedef struct Pt{
   int x;
   int y;
}POINT;


POINT *mypoints;
int a = 10;
int b = 1000;

mypoints = (POINT*) malloc (100 * sizeof(POINT));

for (int i =0; i < 100; i++) {
    mypoints->x = a++;
    mypoints->y = b++;
    ++mypoints;
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T09:20:31+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 9:20 am

    Such allocation schemes have been used everywhere from the early Unix file system to Python’s internal list allocation.

    Code on!

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.