Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9290843
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T20:30:45+00:00 2026-06-18T20:30:45+00:00

What I know? There is an array, int a[10] , and to access first

  • 0

What I know?

There is an array, int a[10], and to access first element of it, I can either use a[0] or 0[a];
which leads to

*(a+0) and *(0+a) -> Both results in accessing first element of the array. 

What I want to know?

I want to know whether are any cases where it is more practical to use 0[a] instead of a[0]?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T20:30:47+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 8:30 pm

    No, it’s the other way around. a + b and b + a mean the same thing when one is a pointer and the other is an integer. That leads to *(a + b) and *(b + a) meaning the same thing, and that leads to a[b] and b[a] meaning the same thing.

    There are some cases that are made more readable by adding a pointer to an integer (i + p). There are no cases that are more readable by indexing an integer (i[p]). Don’t do it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Does anyone know do there have any way that I can encrypt the array
There is an associative array with only one pair key=>value . I don't know
I know there are lots of tools on the net that can make our
I know there is a lot on this topic but I can't get any
I know there isn't any limit for a VARCHAR column, and it can be
I know that there isn't way to access to the links of variables in
How can one iterate through an array to manipulate or access different objects and
We all know the basic rules for static array: int size = 20; char
How would one access an entire row of a multidimensional array? For example: int
I know there have been many questions on grid and pack in the past

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.