Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8754583
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T13:39:20+00:00 2026-06-13T13:39:20+00:00

What I would like to have is something like this: public abstract Class Content

  • 0

What I would like to have is something like this:

public abstract Class Content {
    private Map<Class<? extends Content>, List<? extends Content>> relations;
}

Content has a bunch of subclasses – A,B,C,D etc…

The most frequent use case is to get all A’s:

public List<A> getA() {
    return (List<A>)relations.get(A.class);
}

Kind of ok – apart from the ugly cast.

But the real problem is there’s nothing stopping me from doing something stupid like:

relations.put(A.class, List<B> myListOfBs);

So a call to getA() above would result in a horrible cast exception. Is there any way I can write it so the compiler would warn me in the above example – and also remove the need for the ugly cast.

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T13:39:21+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 1:39 pm

    You can create a wrapper around a Map and use a generic method to constrain your put method:

     public class HeterogeneousContainer {
         private final Map<Class<? extends Content>, List<? extends Content>> map;
    
         public <T extends Content> void put(Class<T> type, List<T> values) {
             map.put(type, values);
         }
    
    
         public <T extends Content> List<T> get(Class<T> type) {
             //this warning can be safely suppressed after inspection
             return (List<T>) map.get(type); 
         }
     }
    

    Now you know that as long as the users of the container aren’t using it improperly (i.e. in raw form) then the key and value must correspond…you couldn’t call put(B.class, listOfAs);.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have something like this: public abstract class Menu { public Menu() { init();
Suppose I have something like this: public abstract class AbstractDataObject { public abstract void
I want something like this: public abstract class ListenerEx<LISTENER, PARENT> implements LISTENER { PARENT
I have defined an Action pure abstract class like this: class Action { public:
I have an abstract base class called WidgetBase which looks like this: public abstract
I would like to do something like this in HTML5 where I have something
I'm looking to create something like in this image. Each block would have an
I have something like the following in the header class MsgBase { public: unsigned
Having this tasteful class public abstract class CakeSkill { //.. boolean cherry=false; private void
I have one supertype defined as: public abstract class AType<T> { .... private T

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.