Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5955517
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T18:07:33+00:00 2026-05-22T18:07:33+00:00

What if I have an object, say NSIndexPath in which before I do a

  • 0

What if I have an object, say NSIndexPath in which before I do a copy I always release it first?

Is it possible to have a memory count under 0?
I am doing this to prevent memory leaks.. is this a good way?

//global already has some value before in here or it doesn’t have a value.. I want to update
//this with a new value (I no longer care to the old pointer)

 [global release]
 global = [indexPath copy];
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T18:07:33+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 6:07 pm

    Don’t. When the retain count reaches 0, your object will be dealloc’ed and its pointer will become invalid, so using it again will cause unpredictable results (namely crashing).

    You should read through Apple’s Memory Management Guide.

    This is the fundamental rule:

    • You only release or autorelease objects you own. You take ownership of an object if you create it using a method whose name begins with “alloc”, “new”, “copy”, or “mutableCopy” (for example, alloc, newObject, or mutableCopy), or if you send it a retain message.
    • You use release or autorelease to relinquish ownership of an object. autorelease just means “send a release message in the future” (specifically: when the used autorelease pool receives a drain message).

    Update:

    As Josh pointed out, the one case you need to consider is when global and indexPath are the same. In that case, you would still “need” the pointer (to perform the copy), so you either autorelease (instead of releasing) or you use a temporary variable to handle that.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Lets say I have a single object of type Car which I want to
if I have an object say called MyObject, which has a property called MyChild,
Lets say I have object Tom which has class Person. Class Person String Name
Let's say we have a object called a Widget, for which we can construct
If I have a form-backing object that has a complicated object tree -- say
So I have an object graph, let's just say it's an order. You have
Let's say I have a List object and an iterator for that list. Now
Lets say I have a Dictionary object: Dictionary myDictionary<int, SomeObject> = new Dictionary<string, SomeObject>();
Let's say that you have overridden an object's equals() and hashCode() methods, so that
So let's say we have a domain object such as the following public class

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.