Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 598379
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T16:22:56+00:00 2026-05-13T16:22:56+00:00

What is an efficient way to initialize and access elements of a large array

  • 0

What is an efficient way to initialize and access elements of a large array in Python?

I want to create an array in Python with 100 million entries, unsigned 4-byte integers, initialized to zero. I want fast array access, preferably with contiguous memory.

Strangely, NumPy arrays seem to be performing very slow. Are there alternatives I can try?

There is the array.array module, but I don’t see a method to efficiently allocate a block of 100 million entries.

Responses to comments:

  • I cannot use a sparse array. It will be too slow for this algorithm because the array becomes dense very quickly.
  • I know Python is interpreted, but surely there is a way to do fast array operations?
  • I did some profiling, and I get about 160K array accesses (looking up or updating an element by index) per second with NumPy. This seems very slow.
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T16:22:56+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 4:22 pm

    I have done some profiling, and the results are completely counterintuitive.
    For simple array access operations, numpy and array.array are 10x slower than native Python arrays.

    Note that for array access, I am doing operations of the form:

    a[i] += 1
    

    Profiles:

    • [0] * 20000000

      • Access: 2.3M / sec
      • Initialization: 0.8s
    • numpy.zeros(shape=(20000000,), dtype=numpy.int32)

      • Access: 160K/sec
      • Initialization: 0.2s
    • array.array(‘L’, [0] * 20000000)

      • Access: 175K/sec
      • Initialization: 2.0s
    • array.array(‘L’, (0 for i in range(20000000)))

      • Access: 175K/sec, presumably, based upon the profile for the other array.array
      • Initialization: 6.7s
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 449k
  • Answers 450k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Your solution of grabbing the whole bytes then using a… May 15, 2026 at 8:23 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer No, see the documentation of glDrawElements(). You can only achieve… May 15, 2026 at 8:23 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer parse() returns NaN on an impossible parse so how about… May 15, 2026 at 8:23 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.