Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8659791
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 12, 20262026-06-12T16:05:36+00:00 2026-06-12T16:05:36+00:00

What is an efficient way to test that a hash contains specific keys and

  • 0

What is an efficient way to test that a hash contains specific keys and values?

By efficient I mean the following items:

  • easy to read output when failing
  • easy to read source of test
  • shortest test to still be functional

Sometimes in Ruby I must create a large hash. I would like to learn an efficient way to test these hashes:

expected_hash = {
    :one => 'one',
    :two => 'two',
    :sub_hash1 => {
        :one => 'one',
        :two => 'two'
    },
    :sub_hash2 => {
        :one => 'one',
        :two => 'two'
    }
}

I can test this has several ways. The two ways I use the most are the whole hash at once, or a single item:

assert_equal expected_hash, my_hash
assert_equal 'one', my_hash[:one]

These work for small hashes like our example hash, but for a very large hash these methods break down. The whole hash test will display too much information on a failure. And the single item test would make my test code too large.

I was thinking an efficient way would be to break up the tests into many smaller tests that validated only part of the hash. Each of these smaller tests could use the whole hash style test. Unfortunately I don’t know how to get Ruby to do this for items not in a sub-hash. The sub-hashes can be done like the following:

assert_equal expected_hash[:sub_hash1], my_hash[:sub_hash1]
assert_equal expected_hash[:sub_hash2], my_hash[:sub_hash2]

How do I test the remaining parts of the hash?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-12T16:05:37+00:00Added an answer on June 12, 2026 at 4:05 pm

    When testing, you need to use manageable chunks. As you found, testing against huge hashes makes it difficult to track what is happening.

    Consider converting your hashes to arrays using to_a. Then you can easily use the set operators to compare arrays, and find out what is missing/changed.

    For instance:

    [1,2] - [2,3]
    => [1]
    [2,3] - [1,2]
    => [3]
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm looking for an efficient way to query items, that have identical set of
What is the most efficient way to get Elastic Map Reduce output into SimpleDB?
Is there are more efficient way than the following for selecting the third parent?
Given two integers a and b , is there an efficient way to test
I'm writing a piece of simulation software, and need an efficient way to test
I am searching for an efficient way to test if files exists which have
Possible Duplicate: Most efficient way to test equality of lambda expressions How to check
I'm trying to come up with an efficient way to index my JUnit test,
What is an efficient way to test if rows in a matrix are sorted?
Is there a more efficient way to list files from a bucket in Amazon

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.