Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7725909
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T05:04:20+00:00 2026-06-01T05:04:20+00:00

What is common practice given the two xml formats? And how would you go

  • 0

What is common practice given the two xml formats? And how would you go about converting the first to the second format, regex? Should I have <subgroupones> there at all? Basically any <tags> that have no attributes except <global> should be deleted or if there is a more elegant way.

<global>
    <groupone name="bce">
        <subgroupones>
            <subsgroupone name="a" />
            <subsgroupone name="b" />
            <subsgroupone name="c" />
        </subgroupones>
    <groupone>
</global>

<global>
    <groupone name="bce">
            <subsgroupone name="a" />
            <subsgroupone name="b" />
            <subsgroupone name="c" />
    <groupone>
</global>
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T05:04:22+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 5:04 am

    XML to XML conversion is almost always best handled by Stylesheet Transform (XSLT). PHP has built-in libraries for handling XSLT: http://php.net/manual/en/book.xslt.php

    For example, here’s an XSLT that will copy only elements that have attributes (with the exception of <global> which is always included):

    <?xml version="1.0"?>
    <xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
      <xsl:template match="global | @* | node()[@*]">
        <xsl:copy><xsl:apply-templates select="@* | node()"/></xsl:copy>
      </xsl:template>
    </xsl:stylesheet>
    

    Sample output (not sure yet how to remove that excess space):

    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><global>
        <groupone name="bce">
    
                <subsgroupone name="a"/>
                <subsgroupone name="b"/>
                <subsgroupone name="c"/>
    
        </groupone>
    </global>
    

    You can experiment with this tool: http://xslttest.appspot.com/

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a best-practice or common way in JavaScript to have class members as
I have a question about two operations you commonly see in an example Composite
I have read ( see here ) that common practice to print a stack
So I have, what would seem like a common question that I can't seem
It's at least common practice to treat null BSTR (null WCHAR* pointer) as an
Here's a common practice I see often (including from a very popular iPhone developer
In Java IoC / DI is a very common practice which is extensively used
Using get/set seems to be a common practice in Java (for various reasons), but
I used to work in a place where a common practice was to use
On Windows, it's common practice to create a named mutex and use the presence

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.