Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8899469
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T00:51:52+00:00 2026-06-15T00:51:52+00:00

What is considered 100% when I invoke dotCover from an MSTest build step in

  • 0

What is considered 100% when I invoke dotCover from an MSTest build step in TeamCity? Is 100% all of the compiled code? Is it all the code for all the assemblies which the tests have touched? Is it all the classes which the tests have touched?

When I invoke dotCover from a TeamCity MSTest build step which runs My.Tests.dll, which lines are code are being tracked?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T00:51:53+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 12:51 am

    dotCover only provides reporting on statement-level coverage, where as other tools like NCover also include function and branch coverage.

    With a TeamCity MSTest build step you get to specify which assemblies you want the coverage reported for in the “Filters” field. This allows you to just specify an exclude for a .Tests pattern or just include one assembly. See the TeamCity documentation for more details:
    http://confluence.jetbrains.net/display/TCD7/JetBrains+dotCover

    I believe that if you don’t specify any filters, all code in all assemblies that were loaded into the CLR are included (you have to cause an assembly load from the code you call, so some assemblies might not be included, this is just the lazily loading of the CLR). This is because tools like dotCover use the CLR profiling API and do not instrument your code upfront. Note that dotCover will exclude assemblies from the GAC.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've got about 100 unit tests and with a coverage of %20, which I'm
All, I have a VB6 project with about 100 custom collection classes which I
I considered only Four columns in Excel sheet (i.e A,B,C,D) all remaining columns should
Let's say you have the following. 192.168.0.100 192.168.0.100 192.168.0.100 192.168.0.102 192.168.0.102 192.168.0.100 That's considered
Which one of these two ways is faster and why? window.setTimeout(func(), 100); Or window.setTimeout(function(){func();},
Here is the script: var currentCat = all; $(document).ready(function(){ $(.categoryItem).click(function(event){ $(#browseBookArea).fadeToggle(100); currentCat = $(this).attr(id);
What are some reasons why writing the following piece of code is considered bad
In various C code, I see constants defined like this: #define T 100 Whereas
In this code will the SomeFunction() after the .commit() be considered part of the
Consider a disk file containing 100 records a. How many comparisons would be required

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.