Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 911481
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T17:12:53+00:00 2026-05-15T17:12:53+00:00

What is ‘correct’ query to fetch a cumulative sum in MySQL? I’ve a table

  • 0

What is ‘correct’ query to fetch a cumulative sum in MySQL?

I’ve a table where I keep information about files, one column list contains the size of the files in bytes. (the actual files are kept on disk somewhere)

I would like to get the cumulative file size like this:

+------------+---------+--------+----------------+
| fileInfoId | groupId | size   | cumulativeSize |
+------------+---------+--------+----------------+
|          1 |       1 | 522120 |         522120 |
|          2 |       2 | 316042 |         316042 |
|          4 |       2 | 711084 |        1027126 |
|          5 |       2 | 697002 |        1724128 |
|          6 |       2 | 663425 |        2387553 |
|          7 |       2 | 739553 |        3127106 |
|          8 |       2 | 700938 |        3828044 |
|          9 |       2 | 695614 |        4523658 |
|         10 |       2 | 744204 |        5267862 |
|         11 |       2 | 609022 |        5876884 |
|        ... |     ... |    ... |            ... |
+------------+---------+--------+----------------+
20000 rows in set (19.2161 sec.)

Right now, I use the following query to get the above results

SELECT
  a.fileInfoId
, a.groupId
, a.size
, SUM(b.size) AS cumulativeSize
FROM fileInfo AS a
LEFT JOIN fileInfo AS b USING(groupId)
WHERE a.fileInfoId >= b.fileInfoId
GROUP BY a.fileInfoId
ORDER BY a.groupId, a.fileInfoId

My solution is however, extremely slow. (around 19 seconds without cache).

Explain gives the following execution details

+----+--------------+-------+-------+-------------------+-----------+---------+----------------+-------+-------------+
| id | select_type  | table | type  | possible_keys     | key       | key_len | ref            | rows  | Extra       |
+----+--------------+-------+-------+-------------------+-----------+---------+----------------+-------+-------------+
|  1 | SIMPLE       |     a | index | PRIMARY,foreignId | PRIMARY   |       4 | NULL           | 14905 |             |
|  1 | SIMPLE       |     b | ref   | PRIMARY,foreignId | foreignId |       4 | db.a.foreignId |    36 | Using where |
+----+--------------+-------+-------+-------------------+-----------+---------+----------------+-------+-------------+

My question is:

How can I optimize the above query?

Update
I’ve updated the question as to provide the table structure and a procedure to fill the table with 20,000 records test data.

CREATE TABLE `fileInfo` (
  `fileInfoId` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT
, `groupId` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL
, `name` varchar(128) NOT NULL
, `size` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL
, PRIMARY KEY (`fileInfoId`)
, KEY `groupId` (`groupId`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB;

delimiter $$
DROP PROCEDURE IF EXISTS autofill$$
CREATE PROCEDURE autofill()
BEGIN
    DECLARE i INT DEFAULT 0;
    DECLARE gid INT DEFAULT 0;
    DECLARE nam char(20);
    DECLARE siz INT DEFAULT 0;
    WHILE i < 20000 DO
        SET gid = FLOOR(RAND() * 250);
        SET nam = CONV(FLOOR(RAND() * 10000000000000), 20, 36);
        SET siz = FLOOR((RAND() * 1024 * 1024));
        INSERT INTO `fileInfo` (`groupId`, `name`, `size`) VALUES(gid, nam, siz);
        SET i = i + 1;
    END WHILE;
END;$$
delimiter ;

CALL autofill();

About the possible duplicate question
The question linked by Forgotten Semicolon is not the same question. My question has extra column. because of this extra groupId column, the accepted answer there does not work for my problem. (maybe it can be adapted to work, but I don’t know how, hence my question)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T17:12:53+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 5:12 pm

    You could use a variable – it’s far quicker than any join:

    SELECT
        id,
        size,
        @total := @total + size AS cumulativeSize,
    FROM table, (SELECT @total:=0) AS t;
    

    Here’s a quick test case on a Pentium III with 128MB RAM running Debian 5.0:

    Create the table:

    DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `table1`;
    
    CREATE TABLE `table1` (
        `id` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment,
        `size` int(11) NOT NULL,
        PRIMARY KEY  (`id`)
    ) ENGINE=InnoDB;
    

    Fill with 20,000 random numbers:

    DELIMITER //
    DROP PROCEDURE IF EXISTS autofill//
    CREATE PROCEDURE autofill()
    BEGIN
        DECLARE i INT DEFAULT 0;
        WHILE i < 20000 DO
            INSERT INTO table1 (size) VALUES (FLOOR((RAND() * 1000)));
            SET i = i + 1;
        END WHILE;
    END;
    //
    DELIMITER ;
    
    CALL autofill();
    

    Check the row count:

    SELECT COUNT(*) FROM table1;
    
    +----------+
    | COUNT(*) |
    +----------+
    |    20000 |
    +----------+
    

    Run the cumulative total query:

    SELECT
        id,
        size,
        @total := @total + size AS cumulativeSize
    FROM table1, (SELECT @total:=0) AS t;
    
    +-------+------+----------------+
    |    id | size | cumulativeSize |
    +-------+------+----------------+
    |     1 |  226 |            226 |
    |     2 |  869 |           1095 |
    |     3 |  668 |           1763 |
    |     4 |  733 |           2496 |
    ...
    | 19997 |  966 |       10004741 |
    | 19998 |  522 |       10005263 |
    | 19999 |  713 |       10005976 |
    | 20000 |    0 |       10005976 |
    +-------+------+----------------+
    20000 rows in set (0.07 sec)
    

    UPDATE

    I’d missed the grouping by groupId in the original question, and that certainly made things a bit trickier. I then wrote a solution which used a temporary table, but I didn’t like it—it was messy and overly complicated. I went away and did some more research, and have come up with something far simpler and faster.

    I can’t claim all the credit for this—in fact, I can barely claim any at all, as it is just a modified version of Emulate row number from Common MySQL Queries.

    It’s beautifully simple, elegant, and very quick:

    SELECT fileInfoId, groupId, name, size, cumulativeSize
    FROM (
        SELECT
            fileInfoId,
            groupId,
            name,
            size,
            @cs := IF(@prev_groupId = groupId, @cs+size, size) AS cumulativeSize,
            @prev_groupId := groupId AS prev_groupId
        FROM fileInfo, (SELECT @prev_groupId:=0, @cs:=0) AS vars
        ORDER BY groupId
    ) AS tmp;
    

    You can remove the outer SELECT ... AS tmp if you don’t mind the prev_groupID column being returned. I found that it ran marginally faster without it.

    Here’s a simple test case:

    INSERT INTO `fileInfo` VALUES
    ( 1, 3, 'name0', '10'),
    ( 5, 3, 'name1', '10'),
    ( 7, 3, 'name2', '10'),
    ( 8, 1, 'name3', '10'),
    ( 9, 1, 'name4', '10'),
    (10, 2, 'name5', '10'),
    (12, 4, 'name6', '10'),
    (20, 4, 'name7', '10'),
    (21, 4, 'name8', '10'),
    (25, 5, 'name9', '10');
    
    SELECT fileInfoId, groupId, name, size, cumulativeSize
    FROM (
        SELECT
            fileInfoId,
            groupId,
            name,
            size,
            @cs := IF(@prev_groupId = groupId, @cs+size, size) AS cumulativeSize,
            @prev_groupId := groupId AS prev_groupId
        FROM fileInfo, (SELECT @prev_groupId := 0, @cs := 0) AS vars
        ORDER BY groupId
    ) AS tmp;
    
    +------------+---------+-------+------+----------------+
    | fileInfoId | groupId | name  | size | cumulativeSize |
    +------------+---------+-------+------+----------------+
    |          8 |       1 | name3 |   10 |             10 |
    |          9 |       1 | name4 |   10 |             20 |
    |         10 |       2 | name5 |   10 |             10 |
    |          1 |       3 | name0 |   10 |             10 |
    |          5 |       3 | name1 |   10 |             20 |
    |          7 |       3 | name2 |   10 |             30 |
    |         12 |       4 | name6 |   10 |             10 |
    |         20 |       4 | name7 |   10 |             20 |
    |         21 |       4 | name8 |   10 |             30 |
    |         25 |       5 | name9 |   10 |             10 |
    +------------+---------+-------+------+----------------+
    

    Here’s a sample of the last few rows from a 20,000 row table:

    |      19481 |     248 | 8CSLJX22RCO | 1037469 |       51270389 |
    |      19486 |     248 | 1IYGJ1UVCQE |  937150 |       52207539 |
    |      19817 |     248 | 3FBU3EUSE1G |  616614 |       52824153 |
    |      19871 |     248 | 4N19QB7PYT  |  153031 |       52977184 |
    |        132 |     249 | 3NP9UGMTRTD |  828073 |         828073 |
    |        275 |     249 | 86RJM39K72K |  860323 |        1688396 |
    |        802 |     249 | 16Z9XADLBFI |  623030 |        2311426 |
    ...
    |      19661 |     249 | ADZXKQUI0O3 |  837213 |       39856277 |
    |      19870 |     249 | 9AVRTI3QK6I |  331342 |       40187619 |
    |      19972 |     249 | 1MTAEE3LLEM | 1027714 |       41215333 |
    +------------+---------+-------------+---------+----------------+
    20000 rows in set (0.31 sec)
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.