Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 638783
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T20:46:13+00:00 2026-05-13T20:46:13+00:00

What is good design in this simple case: Let’s say I have a base

  • 0

What is good design in this simple case:

Let’s say I have a base class Car with a method FillTank(Fuel fuel) where
fuel is also a base class which have several leaf classes, diesel, ethanol etc.

On my leaf car class DieselCar.FillTank(Fuel fuel) only a certain type of fuel
is allowed (no surprises there:)). Now here is my concern, according to my interface every car can be tanked with any fuel, but that seems wrong to me, in every FillTank() implementation check the input fuel for the correct type and if not throw error or something.

How can I redesign such case to a more accurate one, is it even possible?
How to design a base method which takes a base-class for input without getting these “strange results”?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T20:46:14+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 8:46 pm

    If there is a hard boundary between types of cars and types of fuel, then FillTank() has no business being in the base Car class, since knowing that you have a car doesn’t tell you what kind of fuel. So, for this to ensure correctness at compile time, FillTank() should be defined in the subclasses, and should only take the Fuel subclass that works.

    But what if you have common code that you don’t want to repeat between the subclasses? Then you write a protected FillingTank() method for the base class that the subclass’s function calls. Same thing goes for Fuel.

    But what if you have some magic car that runs on multiple fuels, say diesel or gas? Then that car becomes a subclass of both DieselCar and GasCar and you need to make sure that Car is declared as a virtual superclass so you don’t have two Car instances in a DualFuelCar object. Filling the tank should Just Work with little or no modification: by default, you’ll get both DualFuelCar.FillTank(GasFuel) and DualFuelCar.FillTank(DieselFuel), giving you an overloaded-by-type function.

    But what if you don’t want the subclass to have a FillTank() function? Then you need to switch to run time checking and do what you thought you had to: make the subclass check Fuel.type and either throw an exception or return an error code (prefer the latter) if there is a mismatch. In C++, RTTI and dynamic_cast<> are what I would recommend. In Python, isinstance().

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm wondering if this is a good design. I have a number of tables
This is a design question and good practice question. How do you structure your
Are there instances where switch(case) is is a good design choice (except for simplicity)
How do you ensure that the project will be build with good design decisions
We need some input on what is a good design pattern on using AJAX
I've been trying to come up with a good design pattern for mapping data
When using an IoC container, is it considered good design to inject other classes
Is there a good Silverlight Design Architecture?
Is it a good idea (from a design POV) to nest constructor calls for
Do you know a good source to learn how to design SQL solutions? Beyond

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.