Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 47053
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T16:03:44+00:00 2026-05-10T16:03:44+00:00

What is the architectural reason for the column names prefixed with Lowered in the

  • 0

What is the architectural reason for the column names prefixed with ‘Lowered’ in the SQL schema for ASP.Net membership and friends? Some examples of the columns in question are below:

  • aspnet_Applications.LoweredApplicationName
  • aspnet_users.LoweredUserName
  • aspnet_membership.LowerEmail

I see that the lowered columns are indexed, but it seems to me that you could just index the associated non-lowered column and leave out the apparent duplication.

I’m sure there is a good reason for them to exist, but I can’t figure it out.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T16:03:44+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 4:03 pm

    There is no purpose for this in a non case sensitive database like SQL Server. This is a reusable database regardless of the type of database in which you are using. E.g. Informix is case-sensitive for all string data which is stored. Using this database on an Informix server would be a good reason to have/use this column instead of lower()’ing the column yourself. I am not saying that you can’t do case sensitive searches in SQL Server by any means (varbinary, BINARY_CHECKSUM, runtime/declarative COLLATE, etc.). This would change the functionality of the out of the box database.

    The idea of any calculated column is to save cycles on doing those calculations during querying. Most especially during large queries. The other thought is one which you had in indexing those columns. Again, this is done to save cycles.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

We're building a business application using Microsoft ASP.NET MVC 3. Some views are now
I'm doing some architectural cleanup that involves moving a bunch of classes into different
having a little architectural trouble here. In C++, we have the notion of 'friends,'
I am using s#arp architecture 2.0 with asp.net mvc 3.0. The razor code in
Is there any architectural or philosophical reason why NHibernate does not have support for
(sorry for reposting this question, for some reason I can't log in to the
I'm about to have to rewrite some rather old code using SQL Server's BULK
Due to some architectural reasons I have to ignore duplicate values on the index.
i'm creating a shopping website using c# and asp.net and i want to use
I have a simple architectural question and would love some advice. I am trying

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.