Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 377869
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T14:44:17+00:00 2026-05-12T14:44:17+00:00

What is the best algorithm to take a long sequence of integers (say 100,000

  • 0

What is the best algorithm to take a long sequence of integers (say 100,000 of them) and return a measurement of how random the sequence is?

The function should return a single result, say 0 if the sequence is not all all random, up to, say 1 if perfectly random. It can give something in-between if the sequence is somewhat random, e.g. 0.95 might be a reasonably random sequence, whereas 0.50 might have some non-random parts and some random parts.

If I were to pass the first 100,000 digits of Pi to the function, it should give a number very close to 1. If I passed the sequence 1, 2, … 100,000 to it, it should return 0.

This way I can easily take 30 sequences of numbers, identify how random each one is, and return information about their relative randomness.

Is there such an animal?

…..

Update 24-Sep-2019: Google may have just ushered in an era of quantum supremacy says:

“Google’s quantum computer was reportedly able to solve a calculation — proving the randomness of numbers produced by a random number generator — in 3 minutes and 20 seconds that would take the world’s fastest traditional supercomputer, Summit, around 10,000 years. This effectively means that the calculation cannot be performed by a traditional computer, making Google the first to demonstrate quantum supremacy.”

So obviously there is an algorithm to “prove” randomness. Does anyone know what it is? Could this algorithm also provide a measure of randomness?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T14:44:18+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 2:44 pm

    It can be done this way:

    CAcert Research Lab does a Random Number Generator Analysis.

    Their results page evaluates each random sequence using 7 tests (Entropy, Birthday Spacing, Matrix Ranks, 6×8 Matrix Ranks, Minimum Distance, Random Spheres, and the Squeeze). Each test result is then color coded as one of “No Problems”, “Potentially deterministic” and “Not Random”.

    So a function can be written that accepts a random sequence and does the 7 tests.
    If any of the 7 tests are “Not Random” then the function returns a 0. If all of the 7 tests are “No Problems”, then it returns a 1. Otherwise, it can return some number in-between based on how many tests come in as “Potentially Deterministic”.

    The only thing missing from this solution is the code for the 7 tests.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

What is the best compression algorithm with the following features: should take less time
According to Marcin Ciura's Optimal (best known) sequence of increments for shell sort algorithm
What would be the best algorithm to solve this problem? I spent a couple
Given an undirected graph what is the best algorithm to detect if it contains
Im creating a minesweeper and just wondering what is the best algorithm to search
i have heard from a friend of mine that the best algorithm for swapping
I've been doing a research about the best algorithm to use in creating a
Short version: What's the best hashing algorithm for a multiset implemented as a dictionary
I'm wondering if this is a sufficient algorithm for finding the best value with
It is known that google has best searching & indexing algorithm. The also have

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.