Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4272910
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T07:38:29+00:00 2026-05-21T07:38:29+00:00

What is the best practice to make edit in junction tables? Items{ItemId, Name, Price…}

  • 0

What is the best practice to make edit in junction tables?

Items{ItemId, Name, Price...}
Shops{ShopId, Name, Address...}
ItemsInShops{ItemId, ShopId, DeliveryDate...}

Now I have 30 items in one shop. I want to edit that list and I uncheck 10 items and check 50 new items.

I do this in the following way: Remove all rows from ‘ItemsInShops’ by ‘ItemId’ and add new values. I don’t think that this is good solution. Is there any better way to do this kind of update?

Maybe I didn’t express problem with good example. Take a look at this:

User{UserId, Username, Password...}
Roles{RoleId, Name, Description} // Admin, Member, Superuser, Junior etc
UsersInRoles{UserId,RoleId}

User can have any number of roles.

John > Admin, Member, Superuser

That is three rows in junction table ‘UserInRoles’.
If I want to update this user to have the following roles:

John > Member, Junior

Now I do this update on database in the following way:
I remove all John roles from ‘UserInRoles’ table and add new data. I don’t know is there any better way to do this update, other than delete all and insert new? What if update fails from some reason (lost internet connection for example)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T07:38:30+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 7:38 am

    I don’t know is there any better way
    to do this update, other than delete
    all and insert new?

    You don’t have to delete all the rows to start with.

    You can delete only the rows that no longer apply, and insert only the rows that are new. Or you can update a value that no longer applies with a value that does apply.

    So to get from this

    Name    Role
    --
    John    Admin
    John    Member
    John    Superuser
    

    to this

    Name    Role
    --
    John    Member
    John    Junior
    

    You can delete what no longer applies . . .

    delete from userinroles
    where Name = 'John' 
      and (Role = 'Admin' or Role = 'Superuser');
    

    and insert what does apply.

    insert into userinroles (Name, Role)
    values ('John', 'Junior');
    

    Or you can update a value with a new value.

    delete from userinroles
    where Name = 'John' 
      and Role = 'Admin';
    

    Followed by

    update userinroles
    set Role = 'Junior'
    where 'Name' = 'John' and Role = 'Superuser';
    

    You said

    What if update fails from some reason
    (lost internet connection for
    example)?

    That’s what transactions are for. Multiple statements within a single SQL transaction are all or nothing–either they all succeed, or no changes are made.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm new to jQuery and image sliders. Is it best practice to make the
The Android documentation says that best practices are to make two drawable directories -
Best practice is to use unique ivs, but what is unique? Is it unique
Short best practice question: If an object A is injected into another object B,
The 'best practice' (as I see it) to atomically create a new file, is
The best practice seems to be to use assert for a condition that should
What would be the best practice to keep the user logged in if he
Is there a best practice for making an entity immutable? Users create exercises in
What is the best practice for generating valid XML with PHP from user submitted
What is the best practice for checking in an EditText for any values before

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.