Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 805783
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T00:08:09+00:00 2026-05-15T00:08:09+00:00

What is the best way to implement an interface that combines some instances of

  • 0

What is the best way to implement an interface that combines some instances of the same interface in various specified ways? I need to do this for multiple interfaces and I want to minimize the boilerplate and still achieve good efficiency, because I need this for a critical production system.

Here is a sketch of the problem.

Abstractly, I have a generic combiner class which takes the instances and specify the various combinators:

class Combiner<I> {
   I[] instances;

   <T> T combineSomeWay(InstanceMethod<I,T> method) {
     // ... method.call(instances[i]) ... combined in some way ...
   }

   // more combinators
}

Now, let’s say I want to implement the following interface among many others:

Interface Foo {
  String bar(int baz);
}

I want to end up with code like this:

class FooCombiner implements Foo {
  Combiner<Foo> combiner;

  @Override 
  public String bar(final int baz) {
    return combiner.combineSomeWay(new InstanceMethod<Foo, String> {
      @Override public call(Foo instance) { return instance.bar(baz); } 
    });
  }
}

Now, this can quickly get long and winded if the interfaces have lots of methods. I know I could use a dynamic proxy from the Java reflection API to implement such interfaces, but method access via reflection is hundred times slower. So what are the alternatives to boilerplate and reflection in this case?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T00:08:09+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 12:08 am

    I would have suggested dynamic proxies – is it really so much slower than a regular method call these days – I’ve heard that reflection does quite a bit of magic under the covers to speed repeated method calls. (And if it is 100x slower, are you sure you will you notice? Ok, just re-read your question – you’ll notice!)

    Otherwise, you basically have the solution in your question: Use a Command object to wrap each method in your interface. You can then pass each instance in the collection of interfaces to the command object for processing.

    Of course, if you’re feeling brave and adventurous, you could generate the implementation of your command objects, and the implementation of the combiner interface using dynamic class generation, with cglib, javassist, orther dynamic bytecode generator. That would avoid the boilerplate.

    You may also have some success with aspects, particularly aspectJ with compile-time or load-time weaving, so you avoid reflection overhead. Sorry I can’t give details.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.