Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 579691
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T14:23:35+00:00 2026-05-13T14:23:35+00:00

What is the best way to zero out new memory after calling realloc while

  • 0

What is the best way to zero out new memory after calling realloc while keeping the initially allocated memory intact?

#include <stdlib.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdio.h>

size_t COLORCOUNT = 4;

typedef struct rgb_t {
    int r;
    int g;
    int b;
} rgb_t;

rgb_t** colors;

void addColor(size_t i, int r, int g, int b) {
    rgb_t* color;
    if (i >= COLORCOUNT) {
        // new memory wont be NULL
        colors = realloc(colors, sizeof(rgb_t*) * i);
       //something messy like this...
        //memset(colors[COLORCOUNT-1],0 ,sizeof(rgb_t*) * (i - COLORCOUNT - 1));

         // ...or just do this (EDIT)
        for (j=COLORCOUNT; j<i; j++) {
            colors[j] = NULL;
        }

        COLORCOUNT = i;
    }

    color = malloc(sizeof(rgb_t));
    color->r = r;
    color->g = g;
    color->b = b;

    colors[i] = color;
}

void freeColors() {
    size_t i;
    for (i=0; i<COLORCOUNT; i++) {
        printf("%x\n", colors[i]);
        // can't do this if memory isn't NULL
       // if (colors[i])
         //   free(colors[i]);

    }
}


int main() {
    colors = malloc(sizeof(rgb_t*) * COLORCOUNT);
    memset(colors,0,sizeof(rgb_t*) * COLORCOUNT);
    addColor(0, 255, 0, 0);
    addColor(3, 255, 255, 0);
    addColor(7, 0, 255, 0);


    freeColors();
    getchar();
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T14:23:36+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 2:23 pm

    There is probably no need to do the memset: you may not be using colors[k] before setting it with something valid later. For example, your code sets colors[i] to a newly allocated color pointer, so you didn’t need to set colors[i] to NULL.

    But, even if you wanted to “zero it out so everything is nice”, or really need the new pointers to be NULL: the C standard doesn’t guarantee that all-bits-zero is the null pointer constant (i.e., NULL), so memset() isn’t the right solution anyway.

    The only portable thing you can do is to set each pointer to NULL in a loop:

    size_t k;
    for (k=COLORCOUNT; k < i+1; ++k) /* see below for why i+1 */
        colors[k] = NULL;
    

    Your primary problem is that your realloc() call is wrong. realloc() returns a pointer to the resized memory, it doesn’t (necessarily) resize it in-place.

    So, you should do:

    /* i+1 because you later assign to colors[i] */
    rgb_t **tmp = realloc(colors, (i+1) * sizeof *tmp);
    if (tmp != NULL) {
        /* realloc succeeded, can't use colors anymore */
        colors = tmp;
    } else {
        /* realloc failed, colors is still valid */
    }
    

    If you really want to know what the memset() call should be, you need to set to zero the memory starting at colors+COLORCOUNT, and set i+1-COLORCOUNT members to zero:

    memset(colors+COLORCOUNT, 0, (i+1-COLORCOUNT) * sizeof *colors);
    

    But as I said above, all bytes zero is not guaranteed to be a NULL pointer, so your memset() is useless anyway. You have to use a loop if you want NULL pointers.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 300k
  • Answers 300k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer boost::ptr_vector<Foo> a, b; // transfer one element a[i] to the… May 13, 2026 at 8:02 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Something like: Post.objects.filter(author=user) Where user is the relevant user should… May 13, 2026 at 8:02 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Have you tried: $.post( 'php/performSearch.php', { keywords: $('#keywords').val(), filters: filtersArray… May 13, 2026 at 8:02 pm

Related Questions

I've been tasked with determining if it's possible to detect link clicks with javascript.
What is the best way to choose a random file from a directory in
We decided to use mongodb for some web application (instead of mysql) but want
I am writing a drupal module that involves a form with many checkboxes. E.g.
I have a huge excel workbook that I've been developing to do some cost

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.