Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7932503
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 3, 20262026-06-03T21:02:36+00:00 2026-06-03T21:02:36+00:00

What is the better approach? adding multiple DOM elements to a parent node and

  • 0

What is the better approach?

  1. adding multiple DOM elements to a parent node and setting all of them but one to “hidden” (disply='none'). On demand set the currently visible element to “hidden” and another one to “visible”.

  2. Just add one DOM element and on demand change its attributes and content.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-03T21:02:37+00:00Added an answer on June 3, 2026 at 9:02 pm

    Definitely option 1. Messing around with the DOM is never a good idea. We just all do it out of necessity.

    The less you change the DOM, the better.

    P.S. remember to cache your selectors…

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Can Any one suggest me which is the better approach to work with NSInputStream.
What is a better approach to serialize custom class: using XMLSerializer or BinarryFormatter and
Following-up on the IDialogService approach: What about the System.Windows.MessageBoxResult enum? Is the better approach
Which approach is better: 1) to use a third-party ORM system or 2) manually
Which approach is better to use if I need a member (sp or func)
Which is the better API? I think the latter approach is better because strings
any better way to write this ? $(this).parent().parent().find( dd ul).toggle(); update.. I am trying
im searching for a convenient way of adding new arguments to multiple init-methods. its
How would you approach setting up 301 redirects within Kentico CMS (v5.0)? I want
We have an application with multiple subsystems running in different threads (ie one thread

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.