Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7730371
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T06:12:31+00:00 2026-06-01T06:12:31+00:00

What is the canonicalization tag which is used in xml signatures. It is present

  • 0

What is the canonicalization tag which is used in xml signatures. It is present in the <signed info> element. I have gone through various documents over the net. But all of them are too abstract for me to understand. It would be helpful if some one could explain what should be contained in the canonicalization tag and how should it be used?
I also have a doubt in the <signature value> element. What does it contain the signature of?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T06:12:33+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 6:12 am

    A signature in general is used (beside tracebility reasons) as a prove for the recipient, that the message was not altered during its way (by a man in the middle for instance).

    ->Keyword: Integrity:

    Problem:

    XML offers several valid ways to structure same (input-)data like:

    1. <a>1</a><!--comment--> <b></b>
    2. <a>1</a><b/>

    This makes a creation of a determinable signature hash impossible, which is a must for a working signature-verification.
    For example a MD5 hash over both XML-examples above would result in complete different result-hashes, although both examples provide the same valid data in XML-form (they are semantically identical).

    Solution:
    This is, where a XML canonicalization (c14n) comes in:
    The message is formatted (canonicalized) by the sending party (client) and also after reception on receiver side (server), so that the hash does not change for same data (on XML-level).

    I guess you’re just curious about this stuff, cause typically you should not take care about this, as the libs (XMLDSig-libs, WS-Security-libs, ..) are taking care of this behind the scenes.

    Re 2nd question:
    The SignatureValue element contains the Base64 encoded signature result of the SignedInfo element.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a JavaScript library for XML canonicalization with support for Exclusive XML Canonicalization
Here i have a div in which i am showing it during the mouse
We have a question with regards to XML-sig and need detail about the optional
htaccess is enabled, i have the canonicalization running (no-www to www.) I'm trying to
I'm writing a C# DKIM validator and have come across a problem that I
I am probably attempting to take URL Canonicalization a bit too far but here
I'm getting two different hashes of the same xml document when I directly canonicalize
I am attempting to perform some text canonicalization to replace some contractions. Here is
I have a site that is about to launch and a request for URL
I'm trying to apply the C14N transform to some generated XML. It appears I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.