Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 538391
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T10:01:36+00:00 2026-05-13T10:01:36+00:00

What is the correct type to use for declaring a metavariable that possibly could

  • 0

What is the correct type to use for declaring a metavariable that possibly could match either variables or members in a struct?

Take for instance the following example source code:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

struct some_struct {
        int i;
        char *s;
};

void test(void)
{
        struct some_struct *ptr;
        char *s;

        s = malloc(100);
        ptr = malloc(sizeof(struct some_struct));
        ptr->s = malloc(100);

        puts("done");
}

With the following semantic patch:

@@
identifier ptr;
//idexpression ptr;
//expression ptr;
expression E;
@@

ptr = malloc(E);
+if (ptr == NULL)
+       return;

the ptr->s allocation is not matched unless expression ptr is used. To use expression for this seems a bit too broadly to me. Is this correct and the only way to do it?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T10:01:36+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 10:01 am

    In general, you want to catch any lvalue pointer – but since you’re only matching places where the expression is assigned a value from malloc, a plain expression will do the job fine (since a non-pointer or non-lvalue should make the compiler complain).

    The problem you’re going to have is if the expression has sideeffects, eg:

    struct some_struct *a[10];
    int i = 0;
    
    a[i++] = malloc(sizeof(struct some_struct));
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Why is the compiler unable to infer the correct type for the result from
Am I correct in assuming that the only difference between "windows files" and "unix
Am I correct in assuming that I always need to explicitly deploy referenced assemblies
When I use a ListBox - the elements inside are of type ListBoxItem, for
Correct me if I'm wrong, but a build is a compile, and not every
Correct me if I am wrong, int is 4 bytes, with a range of
What is the correct way to import a C++ class from a DLL? We're
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but parsing a yyyy/MM/dd (or other specific
Is it correct to link a static library (.lib) compiled with VS 2005 with
Which is the most correct code? if (HttpContext.Current.Response.Cookies[authCookieName] != null) { HttpContext.Current.Response.Cookies[authCookieName].Value = New

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.