Home/ Questions/Q 7639811
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-31T08:31:02+00:00

What is the difference between these headers? Content-Type: application/javascript Content-Type: application/x-javascript Content-Type: text/javascript Which

  • 0

What is the difference between these headers?

Content-Type: application/javascript
Content-Type: application/x-javascript
Content-Type: text/javascript

Which one is best and why?

Please do not say they are identical – if they were identical there would not have been three of them. I know both work – but I would like to know the difference.

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    The JavaScript MIME Type

    When sending JavaScript content, you should use text/javascript as per RFC 9239.

    Aliases

    application/javascript, application/x-javascript, text/javascript1.0, text/javascript1.1, text/javascript1.2, text/javascript1.3, text/javascript1.4, text/javascript1.5, text/jscript, and text/livescript are deprecated aliases for it. If you are writing a tool which consumes JavaScript (e.g. an HTTP client) then you should consider supporting them for backwards compatibility.

    History

    The text/javascript MIME type was used by convention until RFC 4329 attempted to replace it with application/javascript.

    This was just a change so that the text/* and application/* MIME type groups had a consistent meaning where possible. (text/* MIME types are intended for human readable content, JavaScript is not designed to directly convey meaning to humans).

    The industry largely ignored the specification so the current specification abandoned the attempt.

    X- prefixes

    Some of the MIME types mentioned here use an x- prefix. This was used to indicate experimental MIME types that had not been standardised. As per RFC 6648, this convention is deprecated.

    HTML

    While this question is about HTTP, it is worth mentioning the related type attribute in HTML.

    When loading a traditional script, I recommend you omit the type attribute entirely. It has no effect but provides the opportunity to make a typo causing the browser to treat it as pointing to an unrecognised script type and ignore it. If you do provide it, then use text/javascript as some deprecated MIME types will not be recognised.

    When loading a JavaScript module, use type="module" (note that this value is not a MIME type!).

    • 0