Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
What is the difference between Unbuffered I/O and standard I/O? I know that using read(), write(), close() are unbuffered IO. Printf and gets are buffered IO. I also know that it is better to use buffered IO for big transactions. I just dont know the reason why. And what does the term “buffered” mean in this context?
Unbuffered I/O simply means that don’t use any buffer while reading or writing.Generally when we use System calls like read() and write() they read and write char by char and can cause huge performance degradation . So for huge date generally high level reads/writes or simply buffered I/O are preferred .Buffered simply means that we are not dealing with single char but a block of chars, that is why sometimes it also known as block I/O.Generally in Unix when we use high level read/write functions they fetch/store the data of a given block size and place them in buffer cache and from this buffer cache these I/O functions get the desired amount of data.