What is the difference, if any, between the <description> tag and the <content:encoded> tag in RSS 2.0 format specifications?
Is one more important than the other?
Should I be using both in my feeds or one will suffice?
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
The
<description>tag is for the summary of the post, but in plain text only. No markup.You can get around that if you escape the tags or wrap the content in:
But you’re not really supposed to be doing that.
If you want markup, you’re supposed to use
<content:encoded>and use the<![CDATA[and]]>wrappers here.In short,
<description>is for the summary and the rest of the post is in<content:encoded>.Since some readers may not support the tags as expected, you usually see the entire post in
<description>and not a mix of the two.