Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7517957
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T01:36:46+00:00 2026-05-30T01:36:46+00:00

What is the implementation of GCC’s (4.6+) __builtin_clz ? Does it correspond to some

  • 0

What is the implementation of GCC’s (4.6+) __builtin_clz? Does it correspond to some CPU instruction on Intel x86_64 (AVX)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T01:36:48+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 1:36 am

    It should translate to a Bit Scan Reverse instruction and a subtract. The BSR gives the index of the leading 1, and then you can subtract that from the word size to get the number of leading zeros.

    Edit: if your CPU supports LZCNT (Leading Zero Count), then that will probably do the trick too, but not all x86-64 chips have that instruction.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Just out of interest. How does GCC's C++ implementation handle it's standard number types
Examining the compiled code of the sinf() on our GCC implementation, I see that
While working on this question , I noticed that GCC (v4.7)'s implementation of std::function
I have seen some implementation as follows: let rec fact = fun n ->
What does this GCC warning mean? cpfs.c:232:33: warning: ISO C99 requires rest arguments to
In the gcc implementation this works trivially; the parameters are only applied as simple
Allegedly inlining std::inner_product() does NOT get inlined with gcc compiler < gcc 4.1 compilers,
Can I somehow use inline assembly in Haskell (similar to what GCC does for
I got tired of waiting for compiler support of nullptr ( gcc 4.6 does
So, I'm messing around with some interposing code on OSX (gcc 4.2.1) and I'm

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.