Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3231772
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T17:05:03+00:00 2026-05-17T17:05:03+00:00

What is the locking granularity used for local temp tables in MSSQL? Given that

  • 0

What is the locking granularity used for local temp tables in MSSQL? Given that local temp tables are local to sessions, and sessions are the same as connections in MSSQL2K, and that there is no way to execute any statements or other code in parallel on the same connection through TSQL or other means (I believe), then intuitively the DB should just hold an exclusive table lock for the lifetime of the table. This would avoid locking memory usage and locking escalation. I can’t get a clear answer on this anywhere. Is this the case?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T17:05:03+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 5:05 pm

    A # temp table just a table, but sits in tempdb. The same locking granularity applies because it is a table.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I was reading about threading and about locking. It is common practise that you
Do I need locking for _userByNameQuery static field Yes/No and way? public class SomeClass
I am trying to debug some C/Java bindings that use some custom refcounting/locking. I
According to the MySQL manual : For large tables, table locking is often better
I'm implementing a locking and copy protection system for my software. I've shut every
I am implementing a locking system in my app which protects my app against
I have a question about locking. This doesn't have to be only about record
I would like to know who is locking a file (win32). I know about
I am having one requirement for locking the entire dataset. Is it possible to
We are looking to implement Optimistic locking in our WCF/WPF application. So far the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.