Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 120291
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T03:47:17+00:00 2026-05-11T03:47:17+00:00

What is the most bandwidth efficient way to unidirectionally synchronise a list of data

  • 0

What is the most bandwidth efficient way to unidirectionally synchronise a list of data from one server to many clients?

I have sizeable chunk of data (perhaps 20,000, 50-byte records) which I need to periodically synchronise to a series of clients over the Internet (perhaps 10,000 clients). Records may added, removed or updated only at the server end.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T03:47:17+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 3:47 am

    Ok, so we’ve got some detail now – perhaps 10 GB of total (uncompressed) data, every 3 days, so that’s 100 GB per month.

    That’s actually not really a sizeable chunk of data these days. Whose bandwidth are you trying to save – yours, or your clients’?

    Does the data perhaps compress very readily? For raw binary data it’s not uncommon to achieve 50% compression, and if the data happens to have a lot of repeated patterns within it then 80%+ is possible.

    That said, if you really do need a system that can just transfer the changes, my thoughts are:

    1. make sure you’ve got a well defined primary key field – use that as your key to identify each record
    2. record a timestamp for each record to say when it last changed
    3. have each client tell you the timestamp of the last change it knows of, so you can calculate the deltas
    4. ensure that full downloads are possible too, in case clients get out of sync
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I keep reading that using Android C2DM is the most efficient solution, bandwidth wise,
I have a Web server that updates its data once per minute, and want
I'm trying to create a bandwidth monitor - I've done most of it, but
Most of the ASP.NET MVC paging solutions I have found by googling look like
In one of my applications, I need to download about 50,000 XML documents, most
I have a handful of servers all connected over WAN links (moderate bandwidth, higher
I'm trying to encode raw pcm data as uLaw to save on the bandwidth
We have developed a vacation rental application in ASP.NET with SQL server as DB.
Is there a way to measure how many bytes a particular socket sends/receives inside
There are n clients, the main concern is that is most of them is

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.