Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8988009
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T21:55:32+00:00 2026-06-15T21:55:32+00:00

What is the most efficient way of saving a numpy masked array? Unfortunately numpy.save

  • 0

What is the most efficient way of saving a numpy masked array? Unfortunately numpy.save doesn’t work:

import numpy as np
a = np.ma.zeros((500, 500))
np.save('test', a)

This gives a:

NotImplementedError: Not implemented yet, sorry...

One way seems to be using pickle, but that unfortunately is not very efficient (huge file sizes), and not platform-independent. Also, netcdf4 seems to work, but it has a large overhead just to save a simple array.

Anyone has had this problem before? I’m tempted just to do numpy.save of array.data and another for the mask.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T21:55:33+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 9:55 pm
    import numpy as np
    a = np.ma.zeros((500, 500))
    a.dump('test')
    

    then read it with

    a = np.load('test')
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

What is the most simple and efficient way of saving an array of strings
What is the most efficient way to empty an Array or Vector in ActionScript
Which way is the most efficient way to save sql data compare base-64 or
What is the most efficient way to check if the current QTP test execution
What is the most efficient way to produce an array of 100 numbers that
My question is what is the best and most efficient way to save a
What's the most efficient way to create this simple array dynamically. var arr =
What is the MOST EFFICIENT way to have an array of values and turn
What is the most efficient way to get Elastic Map Reduce output into SimpleDB?
What is the most efficient way to sort a list, [0,0,1,0,1,1,0] whose elements are

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.