Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7802215
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 2, 20262026-06-02T01:11:42+00:00 2026-06-02T01:11:42+00:00

What is the most elegant way to identify an error into transaction? At this

  • 0

What is the most elegant way to identify an error into transaction? At this time my code is like:

begin transaction tx1
update ....
insert ....
if @@error = 0
   commit
else
   rollback
end

This only catch last operation error, in this case errors on insert but not first operation error, in my case, update errors. How can I improve my code?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-02T01:11:44+00:00Added an answer on June 2, 2026 at 1:11 am

    Have you looked at TRY/CATCH?

    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms175976.aspx

    Of course you’ll still only be able to catch the first error that sent you into CATCH if you do something like this:

    BEGIN TRANSACTION; -- not sure why you're using a named transaction
    
    BEGIN TRY
      UPDATE ...
      INSERT ...
      COMMIT TRANSACTION;
    END TRY
    BEGIN CATCH
      PRINT ERROR_MESSAGE();
      ROLLBACK TRANSACTION;
    END CATCH
    

    But you can wrap each operation in its own TRY/CATCH, e.g.

    BEGIN TRANSACTION; -- still not sure why you're using a named transaction
    
    BEGIN TRY
      UPDATE ...
      COMMIT TRANSACTION;
    END TRY
    BEGIN CATCH
      PRINT ERROR_MESSAGE();
      ROLLBACK TRANSACTION;
    END CATCH
    
    BEGIN TRANSACTION;
    
    BEGIN TRY
      INSERT ...
      COMMIT TRANSACTION;
    END TRY
    BEGIN CATCH
      PRINT ERROR_MESSAGE();
      ROLLBACK TRANSACTION;
    END CATCH
    

    But then I’m not sure what rules you’d want to follow here… do you want the insert to succeed if the update failed? If you want all actions to succeed or fail as a group then you want the first approach where everything is attempted in one TRY.

    Also you should look at Erland Sommarskog’s bible on error handling:

    http://www.sommarskog.se/error_handling_2005.html

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

What's the most elegant way of doing something like this: >>> tests = [false,
What is the most elegant way to solve this: open a file for reading,
What is the most elegant way of bubble-sorting in F#? UPDATE As pointed out
What is the most elegant way to implement this function: ArrayList generatePrimes(int n) This
What is the shortest / most elegant way to implement the following Scala code
What is the most elegant way to say this in JS?: search_keyword = search_keyword.toLowerCase();
I'm looking for the most elegant way to parse this. I'm just hitting a
Do you have any insights into the most elegant way of persisting objects from
What's the most elegant way to get this array [10, 20, 30, 40, 50]
What's the most elegant way to collapse duplicate columns from tabular data into lists?

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.