Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 188251
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T15:58:26+00:00 2026-05-11T15:58:26+00:00

What is the most pythonic way to build a dictionary where I have the

  • 0

What is the ‘most pythonic’ way to build a dictionary where I have the values in a sequence and each key will be a function of its value? I’m currently using the following, but I feel like I’m just missing a cleaner way. NOTE: values is a list that is not related to any dictionary.

for value in values:     new_dict[key_from_value(value)] = value 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T15:58:26+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 3:58 pm
    >>> l = [ 1, 2, 3, 4 ] >>> dict( ( v, v**2 ) for v in l ) {1: 1, 2: 4, 3: 9, 4: 16} 

    In Python 3.0 you can use a ‘dict comprehension’ which is basically a shorthand for the above:

    { v : v**2 for v in l } 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Given an ordered Python dictionary, what is the most Pythonic way to truncate its
He're an interesting problem that looks for the most Pythonic solution. Suppose I have
What is the fastest (or most Pythonic) way to convert x = [False, False,
Most program languages have some kind of exception handling; some languages have return codes,
Most mature C++ projects seem to have an own reflection and attribute system ,
Most of the MVC samples I have seen pass an instance of the view
Most of my users have email addresses associated with their profile in /etc/passwd .
Most of my C/C++ development involves monolithic module files and absolutely no classes whatsoever,
Most of time we represent concepts which can never be less than 0. For
Most of the implementations I find require a hardware instruction to do this. However

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.