Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8552475
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T14:25:54+00:00 2026-06-11T14:25:54+00:00

What is the most simple and efficient why to copy an int to a

  • 0

What is the most simple and efficient why to copy an int to a boost/std::array?

The following seems to work, but I’m not sure if this is the most appropriate way to do it:

  int r = rand();
  boost::array<char, sizeof(int)> send_buf;
  std::copy(reinterpret_cast<char*>(&r), reinterpret_cast<char*>(&r + sizeof(int)), &send_buf[0]);
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T14:25:55+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 2:25 pm

    Just for comparison, here’s the same thing with memcpy:

    #include <cstring>
    
    int r = rand();
    boost::array<char, sizeof(int)> send_buf;
    std::memcpy(&send_buf[0], &r, sizeof(int));
    

    Your call whether an explosion of casts (and the opportunity to get them wrong) is better or worse than the C++ “sin” of using a function also present in C 😉

    Personally I think memcpy is quite a good “alarm” for this kind of operation, for the same reason that C++-style casts are a good “alarm” (easy to spot while reading, easy to search for). But you might prefer to have the same alarm for everything, in which case you can cast the arguments of memcpy to void*.

    Btw, I might use sizeof r for both sizes rather than sizeof(int), but it sort of depends whether the context demands that the array “is big enough for r (which happens to be an int)” or “is the same size as an int (which r happens to be)”. Since it’s a send buffer, I guess the buffer is the size that the wire protocol demands and r is supposed to match the buffer, rather than the other way around. So sizeof(int) is probably appropriate but 4 or PROTOCOL_INTEGER_SIZE might be more appropriate still.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Although it seems pretty simple, I'm not sure of the most efficient way of
This is a really simple request, but I am not quite sure the easiest/most
What's the most efficient way to create this simple array dynamically. var arr =
Pardon me if it's simple, but what is the most efficient way to do
I know this is most-likely a simple question but when you restore a database
I am looking for the most efficient/direct way to do this simple C/C++ operation:
This is probably a real simple question but I'm looking for the most memory
What is the most simple and efficient way of saving an array of strings
I think I've settled on this as the most simple and unit-testable method for
What is the most efficient way to split a string by a very simple

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.