Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6352029
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T22:07:28+00:00 2026-05-24T22:07:28+00:00

What is the neatest / shortest way I can write an inline collection initializer?

  • 0

What is the neatest / shortest way I can write an inline collection initializer?

I dont care about reference names, indexes are fine, and the item only needs to be used in the scope of the method.

I think an anonymous type collection would be messier because I would have to keep writing the key name every time.

I’ve currently got

var foo = new Tuple<int, string, bool>[] 
{ 
   new Tuple<int, string, bool>(1, "x", true), 
   new Tuple<int, string, bool>(2, "y", false) 
};

Im hoping c# 4.0 will have something ive missed.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T22:07:29+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 10:07 pm

    The shortest you can get is to use Tuple.Create instead of new Tuple:

    var foo = new [] { Tuple.Create(1, "x", true), Tuple.Create(2, "y", false) };
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

can anyone suggest the neatest way to do this comparison? I need to test
What's the quickest/neatest way to calculate the next anniversary of someone's birthday. For example,
Simple question - In c++, what's the neatest way of getting which of two
What is the best/neatest way to suppress a C compiler (for example GCC) like
I am looking for the neatest way to create an HTML form which does
What is the neatest algorithm for that ? Can it be done without helping/static
Quick question - but I wondered what is the neatest way to achieve the
I'm curious, what would be the neatest way to parse a string of xml
In Python 2.2 (don't ask), what's the neatest way to sort a list and
I am interested in the shortest, neatest piece of C# code around that will

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.