Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 345961
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T11:07:58+00:00 2026-05-12T11:07:58+00:00

What is the overhead for PPP and Ethernet sending 5000 bytes? Frame size for

  • 0

What is the overhead for PPP and Ethernet sending 5000 bytes?

Frame size for Point-to-Point Protocol: 8 bytes
MTU: 500 bytes

Frame size for Ethernet: 18 bytes
MTU: 1500 bytes

Both sending 5000 bytes..

I know this is just a calculation, but I am not sure how to do it. I can’t find it anywhere. I would think that since a PPP frame takes 8 bytes and maximum transmission unit is 500 then it can send (500 – 8)bytes of information in one go. It sends 10 frames, resulting in 4920 bytes sent. Then sends the final (80+8)bytes with the last frame.

Similar for Ethernet. (1500 – 18)bytes with each frame. 3 frames sent means 4446 bytes sent. Sending (554+18)bytes in the last frame.

This obviously doesn’t answer the “overhead” question. Anyone have any ideas?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T11:07:58+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 11:07 am

    It really depends on how you define overhead. This answer will assume overhead is the number of bytes that you need to transmit in addition to the data itself.

    For Ethernet, assuming the 5000 byte payload is not encapsulated in an IP + TCP/UDP frame, you will have 18 bytes of overhead for every packet sent. That means each transmission with an MTU of 1500 will be able to hold 1482 bytes. To transmit 5000 bytes, this means 4 packets must be transmitted, which means an overhead of 72 bytes (18 * 4). Note that the overhead becomes bigger when you include things like the IP frame which contains a TCP frame.

    For PPP, as you’ve already shown, you can send 492 bytes per frame. Eleven frames means 88 bytes of overhead (11 * 8) – again, not including any additional protocol frames within the payload.

    In both these examples any protocols that build on top of these link layer protocols will contribute to overhead. For example, an Ethernet packet sent with an IPv4 frame which contains a UDP datagram will have an additional 28 bytes consumed by headers and not data (20 bytes in an IPv4 header and 8 in a UDP header, assuming no IP options). Considering the original Ethernet example, this means the amount of data per packet becomes 1454 bytes, which luckily still comes to 4 packets (the extra spills over into the smaller 4th packet), with 144 bytes of overhead.

    You can read more here (I find that page a little hard to read though).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 173k
  • Answers 173k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer User.find(user_id).username is one way. If you were to have a… May 12, 2026 at 2:46 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer No, the standard TreeView does not allow columns, what you… May 12, 2026 at 2:46 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Use org.springframework.context.annotation.ClassPathScanningCandidateComponentProvider API A component provider that scans the classpath… May 12, 2026 at 2:46 pm

Related Questions

What is the overhead performance penalty for running Session State Server instead of InProc?
What is the overhead of generating a lot of temporary objects (i.e. for interim
What is the memory layout of a .NET array? Take for instance this array:
I realise the second one avoids the overhead of a function call ( update

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.