Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4029170
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T11:18:41+00:00 2026-05-20T11:18:41+00:00

What is the overhead of continually uploading textures to the GPU (and replacing old

  • 0

What is the overhead of continually uploading textures to the GPU (and replacing old ones). I’m working on a new cross-platform 3D windowing system that uses OpenGL, and am planning on uploading a single Bitmap for each window (containing the UI elements). That Bitmap would be updated in sync with the GPU (using the VSync). I was wondering if this is a good idea, or if constantly writing bitmaps would incur too much of a performance overhead. Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T11:18:42+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 11:18 am

    Well something like nVidia’s Geforce 460M has 60GB/sec bandwidth on local memory.

    PCI express 2.0 x16 can manage 8GB/sec.

    As such if you are trying to transfer too many textures over the PCIe bus you can expect to come up against memory bandwidth problems. It gives you about 136 meg per frame at 60Hz. Uncompressed 24-bit 1920×1080 is roughly 6 meg. So, suffice to say you could upload a fair few frames of video per frame on a 16x graphics card.

    Sure its not as simple as that. There is PCIe overhead of around 20%. All draw commands must be uploaded over that link too.

    In general though you should be fine providing you don’t over do it. Bear in mind that it would be sensible to upload a texture in one frame that you aren’t expecting to use until the next (or even later). This way you don’t create a bottleneck where the rendering is halted waiting for a PCIe upload to complete.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Sometimes the overhead of creating a new model type is annoying. In these cases,
Is there any performance overhead that you take on when using Structs (as compared
Is there much overhead involved in VBA classes? I noticed that on a previous
I was wondering if the overhead associated with creating a new class instead of
I'm working on a system which consists of a chain of data transformation components.
To amortize the function call overhead I have changed my generator so that it
I keep hearing that PHP has overhead. For example a C++ int uses 4
I want a simple variant with minimal overhead that can be passed to functions
I know that holding pointers incurs the overhead of an extra dereference operation but
What is the overhead in the string structure that causes sizeof() to be 32

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.