Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 999803
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T07:24:40+00:00 2026-05-16T07:24:40+00:00

What is the problem here in this code? It gives segmentation fault. I found

  • 0

What is the problem here in this code?
It gives segmentation fault. I found value of size in vector (int *a)
is no more 3. How is this?

 #include <iostream> 

 using namespace std; 

 class vector 
 { 
  int *v; 
  int size; 
     public: 
  vector(int m) 
  { 
   v = new int[size = m]; 
   for(int i=0; i<size; i++) 
    v[i] = 0; 
  } 
  vector (int *a) 
  { 
   for(int i=0; i<size; i++) 
    v[i] = a[i]; 
  } 
  int operator*(vector &y) 
  { 
   int sum = 0; 
   for(int i=0; i<size; i++) 
    sum += this -> v[i] * y . v[i]; 
   return sum; 
  }    
 }; 


 int main() 
 { 
  int x[3] = {1,2,3}; 
  int y[3] = {4,5,6}; 
  vector v1(3); 
  vector v2(3); 
  v1 = x; 
  v2 = y; 
  int R = v1 * v2; 
  cout << "R = " << R; 
  return 0; 
 } 

Sincerely,
Srinivas Nayak

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T07:24:40+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 7:24 am

    In essence the reason it generates a fault is in the line
    v1=x;

    As you have no assignment operator this in effect becomes:
    v1=vector(x)
    Which called your int * constructor. This constructor runs with size initialised to garbage which causes the seg fault as the loop progresses towards invalid memory.

    Strategically the problem is you want create a new object for a int * but you don’t know how big the array is that you are pointing at.

    Your code looks like you want to assume that the array is the correct size for the currently defined vector in which case the operator you want to define this function in preference to the constructor: operator=(int *)

    You generally seem a bit confused about which object is which for example
    sum += this -> v[i] * y . v[i];
    would normally jusy be written as in this context
    sum += v[i] * y . v[i];

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.