Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8825057
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T06:47:12+00:00 2026-06-14T06:47:12+00:00

What is the worst case for quick hull?? And how we can know that

  • 0

What is the worst case for quick hull?? And how we can know that it is the worst case
I am confused with quick hull algorithm. Actually, I understood, that running determinant to find the area of a triangle, and if the area is positive, then the point is on the left of the extreme points.
And doing this thing recursively, will have O(n) efficiency for constructing a hull.
Then I don’t understood, that how to efficiency is sometimes mentioned O(nlogn) and )(n^2)? for which cases this efficiency turns out and how?
please if someone can help by some particular example; that would be great help.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T06:47:14+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 6:47 am

    QuickHull is a fast algorithm because in one of the steps you eliminate a bunch of points that lie inside a triangle. The steps for QuickHull are:

    1. You choose the rightmost and leftmost points and trace a line between them
    2. You find the point that is the farthest from your line
    3. You draw a triangle between these three points
    4. You eliminate points inside your triangle and go back to step 2.

    This is the case when your points are placed randomly on the plane, but there are cases when the points are badly distributed and you can’t eliminate any of them in any given step. One of this cases is when the points are in the border of a circle:

    enter image description here

    As you can see, when this happens, in step 4 of the algorithm above you eliminate no points at all. This is why in the worst case QuickHull is O(n^2).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

1-)For sorted array I have used Binary Search. We know that the worst case
An algorithm having worst-case running time of O(N^2) took 30secs to run for input
I would also like to know which algorithm has the worst case complexity of
How can I calculate worst case running time of this loop? for(int i=1 ;
To compute the worst-case running time function of an algorithm what are the steps
Is there a difference between statement Worst case running time of an Algorithm A
Maybe the worst type of error message that one can see. Does not mean
Simplex algorithm is said to have exponential worst case time complexity. Yet it is
I am little bit confused regarding worst Case time and Avg case Time complexity.
Is it possible for an algorithm/program to have the same worst-case and best-case time?

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.