Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9272367
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T15:51:36+00:00 2026-06-18T15:51:36+00:00

What is wrong with this declaration? char *add_element[] = {1,S}; I get this error

  • 0

What is wrong with this declaration?

char *add_element[] = {"1","S"};

I get this error when I compile this –

warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointer target type

What am I doing wrong?

This question is different from Why I get; initializing 'char *' with an expression of type 'const char *' discards qualifiers?. This can be verified by comment written below. Thanks for answering it.

The possible duplicate question is related, but not the same. It is about why void func(const char *ptr) { char *local = ptr; … } elicits the warning, rather than dealing with an initializer as here. I don’t think this question should be closed as a duplicate of that question

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T15:51:37+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 3:51 pm

    You appear to be using GCC and have -Write-strings turned on. That makes the compiler warn about exactly this situation. It makes the string literals into const char arrays rather than char arrays, making your initialization discard the const. Use:

    const char *add_element[] = { "1", "S" };
    

    Or turn off -Wwrite-strings.

    From the GCC manual:

    -Wwrite-strings

    When compiling C, give string constants the type const char[length] so that
    copying the address of one into a non-const char * pointer will get a
    warning. These warnings will help you find at compile time code that can try
    to write into a string constant, but only if you have been very careful about
    using const in declarations and prototypes. Otherwise, it will just be a
    nuisance. This is why we did not make -Wall request these warnings.

    When compiling C++, warn about the deprecated conversion from string literals
    to char *. This warning is enabled by default for C++ programs.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

What's wrong with this one? The compiler says: Declaration syntax error. Source File: #include<iostream>
I'm playing with pointers and a can't get why this declaration is fine char
What's wrong with this? #include <stdio.h> void main(){ char *s=some text; printf(%d,is_in(s,'t')); } int
If I'm not wrong this kind of declaration may be used to assign default
I have this declaration in my header: - (char*) randomCharGenerator; And the method itself:
What wrong with this validation: Jquery: $(document).ready(function(){ $(#addcmd).attr(disabled,disabled); $(#cmdstxt).keypress( function(event){ var txt=$(#cmdstxt); if( txt.val().length
Why is this wrong? <table> <form> <tr><td>something something</td/> </form> </table> I'm talking about position
Whats wrong with this code? -(void) drawRect:(CGRect) rect { CGContextRef c = UIGraphicsGetCurrentContext(); if
Whats wrong with this picture? Model: validates_acceptance_of :terms_of_service, :on => :create, :accept => true,
whats wrong with this? anybody help me please.. if(stripos($nerde, $hf) !== false) && (stripos($nerde,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.