Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 260829
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T22:22:51+00:00 2026-05-11T22:22:51+00:00

What ways there are for doing a one way XML serialization in .Net? XmlSerializer

  • 0

What ways there are for doing a one way XML serialization in .Net? XmlSerializer won’t write properties that don’t have a public setter. While this limitation is understandable for deserialization I would be satisfied with just serialization for web use. The JSON.Net serialization works great in this situation as it serializes the full object graph not minding even if some properties have no setters defined.

The main goal for these classes is a normal .Net class library. These classes are consumed by other code in 90% of the cases so I am after a solution that doesn’t sacrifice the normal usability of the classes.

The resulting class library should support .Net 2.0.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T22:22:51+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 10:22 pm

    You might want to check this site out: XmlSerializer vs DataContractSerializer

    Beyond that you might consider overriding how your object is being serialized and deciding for yourself what should and should not be in the xml stream.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 182k
  • Answers 182k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You are correct that you are not allocating space for… May 12, 2026 at 4:21 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I don't know the SerialPort gem, but it's possible that… May 12, 2026 at 4:21 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer To see if a database exists, you can sqlite3.connect to… May 12, 2026 at 4:21 pm

Related Questions

So we have this web app where we support UTF8 data. Hooray UTF8. And
I've been doing ASP.NET a little bit (on and off) over the last year,
I need to render quite alot (tens of thousands) images off-screen using OpenGL. I
Is it possible to establish a set of templated function pointers, without the hassle

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.