Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 805315
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T00:03:50+00:00 2026-05-15T00:03:50+00:00

What would be an elegant way to implement the functionality of this nested class

  • 0

What would be an elegant way to implement the functionality of this nested class in F#?

  private class Aliaser {
     private int _count;
     internal Aliaser() { }
     internal string GetNextAlias() {
        return "t" + (_count++).ToString();
     }
  }

This was my first attempt, but it feels like there should be a sexy one-liner for this:

let aliases = (Seq.initInfinite (sprintf "t%d")).GetEnumerator()

let getNextAlias() = 
    aliases.MoveNext() |> ignore
    aliases.Current
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T00:03:51+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 12:03 am

    The usual way of writing is to create a function with local state captured in a closure:

    let getNextAlias = 
      let count = ref 0
      (fun () -> 
         count := !count + 1; 
         sprintf "t%d" (!count))
    

    The type of getNextAlias is simply unit -> string and when you call it repeatedly, it returns strings “t1”, “t2”, … This relies on mutable state, but the mutable state is hidden from the user.

    Regarding whether you can do this without mutable state – the simple answer is NO, because when you call a purely functional function with the same parameter twice, it must return the same result. Thus, you’d have to write something with the following structure:

    let alias, state1 = getNextAlias state0
    printf "first alias %s" alias
    let alias, state2 = getNextAlias state1
    printf "second alias %s" alias
    // ...
    

    As you can see, you’d need to keep some state and maintain it through the whole code. In F#, the standard way of dealing with this is to use mutable state. In Haskell, you could use State monad, which allows you to hide the passing of the state. Using the implementation from this question, you could write something like:

    let getNextAlias = state { 
      let! n = getState
      do! setState (n + 1)
      return sprintf "t%d" n }
    
    let program =
      state { 
        let! alias1 = getNextAlias()
        let! alias2 = getNextAlias() 
        // ...
      }
    
    execute progam 0 // execute with initial state
    

    This is quite similar to other computations such as lazy or seq, actually – computations in the state { .. } block have some state and you can execute them by providing initial value of the state. However, unless you have good reasons for requiring purely functional solution, I’d prefer the first version for practical F# programming.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 469k
  • Answers 469k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Given comments on my previous answer, it seems that I… May 16, 2026 at 2:36 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer There is a key in your app's Info.plist file called… May 16, 2026 at 2:36 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Edit: The suggested code-refactoring below won't reduce the memory consumption… May 16, 2026 at 2:36 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.