Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6997529
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T20:17:42+00:00 2026-05-27T20:17:42+00:00

What would be computationally-efficient ways to select elements touching the top edge of browser

  • 0

What would be computationally-efficient ways to select elements touching the top edge of browser window viewport as the page is scrolled?

See attached image. Green elements are selected because they are touching the top edge.

scrolling

UPDATE

An example of how I’ll use this is to fade elements that are going off-screen. There may be hundreds of them on the page. Imagine a page like Pinterest. Computing offset and scrollTop for hundreds of them at the rate of scroll event, even if throttled still feels really inefficient.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T20:17:43+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 8:17 pm

    This is what I came up with. I think that it could be improved upon by caching the scrollTop values, but this is pretty good. I have included the framework for caching the boxtops, but not the implementation code. I have also only implemented scrolling down to hide divs. I have left reshowing them on upscroll as an exercise for you.

    When the window is scrolled we get the last hidden div. We know that everything before this div is already hidden. Then use a ‘while next element is off the screen’ hide it. As soon as a div isn’t off the screen we abort. Thus saving time from iterating through the entire list.

    http://jsfiddle.net/kkv3h/2/

    //track whether user has scrolled up or down
    var prevScrollTop = $(document).scrollTop();
    
    $(document).scroll(function() {
        var currentScrollTop = $(this).scrollTop();
        if (currentScrollTop > prevScrollTop) {
            //down
            var lasthiddenbox = $('.fadeboxhidden:last');
            var nextbox = (lasthiddenbox.length > 0) ? lasthiddenbox.next('.fadebox') : $('.fadebox:first');
            while (nextbox.length) {
                console.log('box: ' + nextbox.offset().top + ' scroll: ' + currentScrollTop);
                if (nextbox.offset().top < currentScrollTop) {
                    nextbox.animate({ opacity: 0 }, 3000).addClass('fadeboxhidden');
                }
                else { return; } 
                nextbox = nextbox.next('.fadebox:first');
            }        
        } else {
            //up          
        }
        prevScrollTop = currentScrollTop ;
    });
    
    //create an object to hold a list of box top locations
    var boxtops = new Object;
    
    
    //gather all boxes and store their top location
    $('.fadebox').each( function(index) {    
        //you may want to dynamically generate div ids here based on index. I didn't do this
        //because i was already using the id for positioning.
        var divid = $(this).prop('id');
        boxtops[divid] = $(this).offset().top;
        //console.log(boxtops[divid]);    
    });
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a computationally expensive task in perl, and would like to inform the
If I have a pair of floats, is it any more efficient (computationally or
I would like to find all the possible combinations of weighted elements in a
Regardless of ease of use, which is more computationally efficient? Constantly slicing lists and
I was wondering what the most computationally efficient Python way of cracking this problem
Would it not make sense to support a set of languages (Java, Python, Ruby,
Would it be possible to print Hello twice using single condition ? if condition
Would it be possible to show an image in full screen mode using silverlight.
Would the following SQL remove also the index - or does it have to
Would having a nice little feature that makes it quicker to write code like

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.