Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8570807
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T18:38:32+00:00 2026-06-11T18:38:32+00:00

What’s the best practise(design and performance wise) for anonymous classes and static inner classes?

  • 0

What’s the best practise(design and performance wise) for anonymous classes and static inner classes?

Personally I would like to think that static inner classes provide better encapsulation and should give better performance as they dont have access to finalized variables outside their class. But I’ve never really questioned this.

I found one post about this but I felt it didn’t actually answer the question about, just peoples personal thought about it.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T18:38:33+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 6:38 pm

    Inner classes (static or not) have exactly the same access to their enclosing class’ fields and methods as anonymous classes, the difference between static inner classes (actually called nested classes) and (regular, non-static) inner classes being that the static one need an explicit reference to an instance of the enclosing class to access something. Of course, when you need to do that, it’s usually on the instance of the enclosing class that created the inner class, so it’s easier and clearer to use a non-static inner class.

    Examples:

    • Inner class (non-static)

      class A {
          private int field;
      
          private class B {
              public void doSomething() {
                  field++; // Valid
              }
          }
      }
      
    • Nested class (i.e. “static inner class”)

      class A {
          private int field;
      
          private static class B {
              public void doSomething(A a) {
                  a.field++; // Valid
              }
          }
      }
      
    • Anonymous class

      class A {
          private int field;
      
          public void doSomething() {
              new Runnable() {
                  @Override
                  public void run() {
                      field++; // Valid
                  }
              }
          }
      }
      

    Whether you use that accessibility is another question. If you do access private fields of the enclosing class, there’ll be an accessor generated, so it could impact the performance as the cost of calling a method is not the same as accessing a field, but it will probably be negligible in most cases. You should always write correct code first (both in terms of design and functionality) before doing micro-optimizations not based on any measurement. The JIT compiler does a lot of things for you anyway.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I would like to count the length of a string with PHP. The string
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I would like to run a str_replace or preg_replace which looks for certain words
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I would like my Web page http://www.gmarks.org/math_in_e-mail.txt on my Apache 2.2.14 server to display
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.