Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4321596
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T08:45:58+00:00 2026-05-21T08:45:58+00:00

What’s the recommendation regarding conditionally defining member functions in a C++ class? (The question

  • 0

What’s the recommendation regarding conditionally defining member functions in a C++ class? (The question is centered around limiting the external exposure of some classes in a DLL – specifically when those classes are passed in as a parameter). Obviously this isn’t something you want to do to data members, but functions should be OK shouldn’t they?

For example:

class A
{
public:
    void func1();

#ifdef _CONDITION_
    void func2(B b);
#endif    
};

Edited:
Added public modifier to avoid example confusion.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T08:45:59+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 8:45 am

    Generally if you wont want to expose parts of an exported class, then you should consider the option of not exposing the class, but instead providing an abstract interface that your class inherits from.

    eg.

    class AbstractExportedInterface
    {
    public:
        virtual void do_stuff() = 0;
    };
    
    class HasStuffIDontWantToExport : public AbstractExportedInterface
    {
    public:
        void do_stuff();
        void do_other_stuff_that_i_dont_export();
    };
    

    then you would operate on the assumption that you are providing a HasStuffIDontWantToExport* to the DLL user and they only have headers for AbstractExportedInterface.

    EDIT: Response to first comment

    If you have some types (3rd party or otherwise) that you want your client of the DLL to be able to use in some way, but you dont want them to have full access to those types, and you dont have the flexibility to use a direct inheritance hierarchy to create an abstract interface. You might be able to use pimpl pattern to create proxy interfaces for each of the types you want your client to have limited usage of?

    eg.

    class ExportedAbstractProxyObject
    {
    public:
        virtual void do_stuff() = 0;
    };
    
    
    #include <3rdPartyType.h>
    
    class ProxyObject
    {
    public:
        void do_stuff() { pimpl_.actually_do_stuff(); }
    private:
        3rdPartyType pimpl_;
    };
    
    
    class ExportedAbstractProxyOtherObject
    {
    public:
        virtual void do_stuff_with_thing(ExportedAbstractProxyObject* thing) = 0;
    };
    
    
    class ProxyOtherObject
    {
    public:
        void do_stuff_with_thing(ExportedAbstractProxyObject* thing) { thing->do_stuff(); }
    };
    

    So then you can happily export whatever interfaces you like, and completely hide the implementation and 3rd party types inside your DLL. The downside is you obviously then have to create all those proxy object interfaces.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all&#8217;Everest What PHP function
I am doing a simple coin flipping experiment for class that involves flipping a
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
I have some data like this: 1 2 3 4 5 9 2 6
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I want to count how many characters a certain string has in PHP, but
I would like to count the length of a string with PHP. The string

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.